Abstract

Plant awareness is an essential component of biology and sustainability education, yet it remains relatively underdeveloped because plants are often overlooked in both formal learning contexts and everyday life. This study aimed to examine the relationships among science literacy, digital literacy, self-regulated learning, and plant awareness among 513 active biology students from higher education institutions in Eastern Indonesia. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data were collected through an online questionnaire administered via Google Forms and distributed through WhatsApp, and were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. The findings showed that science literacy and digital literacy were positively associated with self-regulated learning and plant awareness. Self-regulated learning was also positively associated with plant awareness and served as a partial mediator in the relationships between both forms of literacy and plant awareness. The mediation model provided a stronger conceptual explanation of how literacy resources are translated into plant awareness, although the direct-effects model showed slightly better predictive accuracy. These findings imply that efforts to strengthen plant awareness should not rely only on biology content delivery, but should also integrate science literacy, digital literacy, and self-regulated learning into contextual learning activities, campus-based plant conservation programs, and higher education policies that support digital, reflective, and sustainability-oriented biology learning.

Keywords

References

• Aksela, O., Lämsä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2025). Secondary school students’ enacted self-regulated learning strategies in a computer-based writing task: Insights from digital trace data and interviews. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(3), 1727–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09789-4
• Alanoglu, M., Karabatak, S., & Yang, H. (2025). Understanding university students’ self-directed online learning in the context of emergency remote teaching: The role of online learning readiness and digital literacy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 37, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09458-0
• Anwar, C., Sofyan, H., Ratnaningsih, N., & AM, M. A. (2024). Digital technology practices for vocational teachers in the industrial revolution 4.0: Mediating technology self-efficacy. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202424585
• Arrafii, M., Sumarsono, D., & Suadiyatno, T. (2025). Self-regulated learning strategies in distance education: Insights from Indonesia. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(4), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202534897
• Asiedu Menlah, C. K., & Boateng, F. O. (2025). Examining the effect of student cognitive awareness and mathematics interest on mathematics achievement. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 6(2), 31438. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202531438
• Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: A systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7395–7419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5
• Bernacki, M. L., Cogliano, M. C., Kuhlmann, S. L., Utz, J., Strong, C., Hilpert, J. C., & Greene, J. A. (2023). Relations between undergraduates’ self-regulated learning skill mastery during digital training and biology performance. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 711–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09356-9
• Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1803589
• Brkovic, I., Sanders, D., & Nyberg, E. (2025). Investigating plant awareness: Methodologies, challenges and possibilities. Plants, People, Planet, 7, 978–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10604
• Chen, C.-F., & Ding, C. G. (2026). An improvement in the detection of common method biases. Quality & Quantity, 60(1), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02167-x
• Coşkunserçe, O. (2024). Use of a mobile plant identification application and the school learning method in biodiversity education. Ecology and Evolution, 14, e10957. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10957
• Çengel, E., & Acar, F. (2026). Teachers’ online teaching competencies for sustainable digital education: Evidence from a cross-national survey. Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202644144
• Danişman, Ş., Ünveren Bilgiç, E. N., & Sapancı, A. (2023). The mediating role of online self-regulation skills in the effect of self-management and self-control on pre-service mathematics teachers’ achievement. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(3), 1939–1956.
• Diepeveen, S., & Pinet, M. (2022). User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation. Development Policy Review, 40, e12671. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12671
• Doshi, A., Weinert, S., & Attig, M. (2024). Self-regulatory abilities as predictors of scientific literacy among children in preschool and primary school years. Learning and Individual Differences, 114, 102515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102515
• Eliyahu, A. B., & Bernacki, M. L. (2026). Availability to learn: An essential, achievable condition for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 38, 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10144-5
• Eriksson, A., Gericke, N., & Olsson, D. (2026). The photosynthesis literacy framework: Updating educational perspectives on photosynthesis education. Research in Science Education, 2, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10314-5
• Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
• Govender, I. (2025). Digital literacy and STEM skills: What is the connection? A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09879
• Guerra, S., Betti, S., Sartori, L., Zani, G., & Castiello, U. (2024). Plant awareness in the hand. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 94, 102246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102246
• Guerrero, G., & Sjöström, J. (2025). Critical scientific and environmental literacies: A systematic and critical review. Studies in Science Education, 61(1), 41–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2344988
• Hackel, J., Imhof, S., & Zizka, A. (2026). Teaching plant identification at a university in the age of artificial intelligence. Plants, People, Planet, 8, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.70033
• Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
• Ismail, I., Hala, Y., Nurhayati, B., Azis, S., & Jamaluddin, A. B. (2026). Predicting biology identity from plant literacy, systems thinking, and reflective judgment: A PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Educational Practice and Policy, 4(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.66314/ijepp.v4i1.418
• Ismail, I., Jamaluddin, A. B., Arifin, A. N., & Pratiwi, A. C. (2026). The power of practicum in science education: An analysis of the role of practical-based learning on learning satisfaction and deep learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 10(1), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202639209
• Johnston, N. (2020). The shift towards digital literacy in Australian university libraries: Developing a digital literacy framework. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1712638
• Kiili, C., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Hagerman, M. S., Räikkönen, E., & Jyrkiäinen, A. (2022). Adolescents’ credibility justifications when evaluating online texts. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7421–7450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10907-x
• Kim, H., Lazurko, A., Linney, G., Maskell, L., Díaz-General, E., Keune, H., Laspidou, C., Malinen, H., Oinonen, S., Raymond, J., Rounsevell, M., Va, S., Ziliaskopoulos, K., & Harrison, P. A. (2024). Understanding the role of biodiversity in the climate, food, water, energy, transport and health nexus in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 925, 171692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171692
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
• Koller, K., Pankowska, P. K., & Brick, C. (2023). Identifying bias in self-reported pro-environmental behavior. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 4, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100087
• Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765
• Lan, M., Liu, H., & Pan, Q. (2025). Unpacking the digital literacy–self-regulated learning nexus: A systematic review and a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 48, 100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100713
• Landolfi, E. (2023). Scientific literacy as part of the science-for-all movement. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 4(1), 20382. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202320382
• Lange, F. (2022). The work for environmental protection task: A consequential web-based procedure for studying pro-environmental behavior. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01617-2
• Liengaard, B. D., Sharma, P. N., Hult, G. T. M., Jensen, M. B., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Prediction: Coveted, yet forsaken? Introducing a cross-validated predictive modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 52(2), 362–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12445
• Maier, C., Thatcher, J. B., Grover, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Cross-sectional research: A critical perspective, use cases, and recommendations for IS research. International Journal of Information Management, 70, 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625
• Oliver, M. C., & Adkins, M. J. (2020). “Hot-headed” students? Scientific literacy, perceptions and awareness of climate change in 15-year-olds across 54 countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101641
• Pany, P., Meier, F. D., Dünser, B., Yanagida, T., Kiehn, M., & Möller, A. (2024). Measuring students’ plant awareness: A prerequisite for effective botany education. Journal of Biological Education, 58(5), 1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2159491
• Parsley, K. M. (2020). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants, People, Planet, 2, 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10153
• Ramdana, A. D., Munir, & Furqon, C. (2026). Advancing digital literacy in higher education through pedagogical innovations and institutional strategies between 2014 and 2025. Discover Education, 5, 227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01256-9
• Ried, L., Eckerd, S., & Kaufmann, L. (2022). Social desirability bias in PSM surveys and behavioral experiments: Considerations for design development and data collection. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(1), 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100743
• Rudolph, J. L. (2023). Scientific literacy: Its real origin story and functional role in American education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61, 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21890
• Sánchez, J. H. C. (2020). The value of virtual natural history collections for botanical instruction in these times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 43(4), 683–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-020-00663-y
• Shi, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Chang, Q. (2023). Understanding and improving nature-related educational ecosystem services in urban green spaces: Evidence from app-aided plant identification spatial hotspots. Ecological Indicators, 151, 110332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110332
• Stagg, B. C., & Dillon, J. (2025). Plants and the Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework: Educational approaches to support pro-conservation behaviours. Journal of Biological Education, 59(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2332728
• Stagg, B. C., Hetherington, L., & Dillon, J. (2025). Towards a model of plant awareness in education: A literature review and framework proposal. International Journal of Science Education, 47(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2342575
• Stroud, S., Fennell, M., Mitchley, J., Lydon, S., Peacock, J., & Bacon, K. L. (2022). The botanical education extinction and the fall of plant awareness. Ecology and Evolution, 12, e9019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9019
• Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
• Uluçınar, U., & Sezer, A. (2026). Exploring signs in nature: The vlog experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 8(2), e45073. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202645073
• Zivan, S. D., & Tsabari, A. B. (2025). The importance of science education, scientific knowledge, and evaluation strategies for the successful detection of COVID-19 misinformation. Science Education, 109, 1733–1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70000

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.