Abstract

Children's drawings are increasingly used as a source of data in qualitative research in education; however, their meaning derives not only from their visual characteristics but also from the professional perspective of the person interpreting them. Drawing on the concept of professional vision, this study aimed to examine how experts from different professional backgrounds interpret the same children's drawings and to identify the aspects in which their interpretations converge and those in which they differ. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 experts representing six professional groups (teachers, early childhood educators, educationalists, psychologists, philosophers, and art experts), who independently interpreted four drawings produced by Year 5 and Year 6 primary school pupils without any additional information about the children or the circumstances in which the drawings had been created. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis with combined deductive-inductive coding. The findings indicate that professional background shapes both the elements to which experts pay the greatest attention and the ways in which they attribute meaning to them. Teachers, early childhood educators, and educationalists primarily focused on the educational context and classroom relationships; psychologists on emotional indicators; art experts on the characteristics of visual expression; and philosophers on the limits of interpretation and the importance of dialogue with the child. At the same time, all professional groups acknowledged the limitations of their own perspectives and emphasised the need for an interdisciplinary approach and the inclusion of additional sources of information, particularly the child's own perspective, when interpreting children's drawings.

Keywords

References

• Akyol, T. (2025). The effect of participatory pedagogy and children’s participation training on early childhood teachers’ views on children’s participation. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(4), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202533781
• Allen, B., & Tussey, C. (2012). Can projective drawings detect if a child experienced sexual or physical abuse? A systematic review of the controlled research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012440339
• Anning, A., & Ring, K. (2004). Making sense of children's drawings. Open University Press.
• Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (The new version). University of California Press.
• Belamarić, D. (1986). Dijete i oblik: Likovni jezik predškolske djece: Knjiga za odgajatelje, roditelje, pedagoge, psihologe, psihijatre [The child and form: The visual language of preschool children: A book for educators, parents, pedagogues, psychologists, and psychiatrists]. Školska knjiga.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2005.6.1.11
• Burkitt, E., Watling, D., & Message, H. (2019). Expressivity in children's drawings of themselves for adult audiences with varied authority and familiarity. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 354-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12278
• Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach. National Children's Bureau.
• Deguara, J. (2015). Meaning-making in young children’s drawings [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield]. White Rose eTheses Online. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/9980/
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach - advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Ablex Publishing.
• Einarsdóttir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children's perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802666999
• Eldén, S. (2013). Inviting the messy: Drawing methods and 'children's voices'. Childhood, 20(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212447243
• Fabris, M. A., Lange-Küttner, C., Shiakou, M., & Longobardi, C. (2023). Editorial: Children's drawings: Evidence-based research and practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1250556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1250556
• Farokhi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2011). The analysis of children's drawings: Social, emotional, physical, and psychological aspects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2219-2224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.433
• Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd rev. ed.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960)
• Golomb, C. (2004). The child's creation of a pictorial world (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. World Book Company.
• Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols (2nd ed.). Hackett Publishing.
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
• Grgurić, N., & Jakubin, M. (1996). Vizualno-likovni odgoj i obrazovanje: Metodički priručnik [Visual arts education: A methodological handbook]. Educa.
• Guillemin, M. (2004). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303260445
• Harrison, L. J., Clarke, L., & Ungerer, J. A. (2007). Children's drawings provide a new perspective on teacher-child relationship quality and school adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.10.003
• Hong, S. B., Broderick, J. T., & McAuliffe, C. M. (2021). Drawing to learn: A classroom case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01041-9
• Imuta, K., Scarf, D., Pharo, H., & Hayne, H. (2013). Drawing a close to the use of human figure drawings as a projective measure of intelligence. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058991
• Karlavaris, B. (1991). Metodika likovnog odgoja 2 [Methodology of visual arts education 2]. Hofbauer.
• Kellogg, R. (1970). Analyzing children's art. Mayfield Publishing.
• Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children's human figure drawings. Grune & Stratton.
• Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1987). Creative and mental growth (8th ed.). Macmillan.
• Luquet, G.-H. (2001). Children's drawings: (Le dessin enfantin) (A. Costall, Trans.). Free Association Books. (Original work published 1927)
• Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Charles C. Thomas.
• Malchiodi, C. A. (1998). Understanding children's drawings. Guilford Press.
• Matthews, J. (2003). Drawing and painting: Children and visual representation (2nd ed.). Paul Chapman Publishing.
• Mori, L. H. (2023). Woke in the dark: Embracing diversity and trust through social and emotional learning in education in the age of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 4(2), 21482. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202321482
• Öztürk, H., & Erzen, E. (2023). Teaching death in Türkiye: The theme of death in illustrated children's books. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(3), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202319688
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Prayitno, P., Harun, H., Syamsudin, A., Purwoko, R. Y., & Setiana, D. S. (2024). Animation-based learning model to stimulate drawing work in children aged 5–6 years. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202427516
• Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009003005
• Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. Routledge.
• Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). Sage.
• Sjöberg, J. (2024). Children’s pictures in research practices across academic disciplines. Child Studies, 6, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.21814/childstudies.5768
• Spajić, V. (1989). Vrednovanje likovnog djela: Pristup pedagogiji umjetnosti [Evaluating works of art: An approach to art pedagogy]. Školske novine.
• Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A., & Stuart, J. (Eds.). (2011). Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-596-3
• Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(2), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01289.x
• Thomas, G. V., & Silk, A. M. J. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children's drawings. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Watts, R. (2010). Responding to children's drawings. Education 3–13, 38(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903107877
• Wood, E., & Hall, E. (2011). Drawings as spaces for intellectual play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(3-4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2011.642253

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.