Abstract

This study examined how scientific and technological literacy relate to self-reported pro-environmental behavior through the mediating role of 21st-century skills among 578 undergraduate Biology Education students from 16 universities in Eastern Indonesia. Drawing on Social Cognitive Theory and the Action Competence Framework, creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication were conceptualized as an integrated competence-enactment mechanism linking literacy to behavioral tendencies. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using PLS-SEM with SmartPLS 4. The 21st-century skills construct was modeled as a second-order mediating variable using the disjoint two-stage approach. The measurement model confirmed satisfactory reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The structural model showed that scientific literacy and technological literacy significantly predicted 21st-century skills, which emerged as the strongest predictor of self-reported pro-environmental behavior. Scientific literacy retained a small but significant direct effect, indicating complementary partial mediation, whereas technological literacy showed no significant direct effect, indicating indirect-only mediation. The mediated model explained 65.1% of the variance in pro-environmental behavior, compared with 50.6% in the direct-effect model. These findings demonstrate that 21st-century skills function as the key mediating mechanism through which literacy competencies are transformed into environmental behavioral tendencies and support the integration of scientific understanding, purposeful technology use, and action-oriented 4C learning in Biology Education curricula.

Keywords

References

• Abiltayeva, A., Dlimbetova, G., Issakhanova, A., & Petrov, B. (2026). Limits of continuous environmental education in developing environmental competencies among students in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1803357. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2026.1803357
• Azennoud, Z. (2022). Technology literacy as a post-COVID-19 survival competence in higher education: A narrative analysis of students’ experiences and prospects. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 3(2), 12968. https://doi.org/10.33902/IJODS.202212968
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
• Benjamin, T. E., Marks, B., Demetrikopoulos, M. K., Rose, J., Pollard, E., Thomas, A., & Muldrow, L. L. (2017). Development and validation of Scientific Literacy Scale for college preparedness in STEM with freshmen from diverse ınstitutions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-015-9710-X
• Bray, A., Byrne, P., & O’Kelly, M. (2020). A short ınstrument for measuring students’ confidence with ‘Key Skills’’ (SICKS): Development, validation and ınitial results.’ Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2020.100700
• Butera, M., & Mukamwambali, C. (2026). Investigating opportunities and challenges of using simulation-based learning in teaching biology in lower secondary schools of Kamonyi district. Discover Education, 5(1), 481. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44217-026-01405-0
• Chen, W., & Erfanian, S. (2026). Drivers of students’ pro-environmental behavior in campus environments in Chinese university. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1760915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1760915
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
• Curcio, C., Capasso, M., Pasquariello, R., Caso, D., & Donizzetti, A. R. (2025). Validation of the Integrated Pro-Environmental Behaviours Scale (I-PEBS). Sustainability, 17(9), 3825. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU17093825
• Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
• Eze, E. C., Okafor, I. G., & Ngwu, L. C. (2026). Effects of computer-based multimedia testing on social studies undergraduates’ academic achievement and retention in environmental education. Sustainable and Pedagogical Technologies, 2(1), e42617. https://doi.org/10.33902/SPT.202642617
• Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/CBE.12-03-0026
• Guerrero, G., & Sjöström, J. (2025). Critical scientific and environmental literacies: a systematic and critical review. Studies in Science Education, 61(1), 41–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2344988
• Guo, X., Shao, F., Hao, X., Ji, X., & Hu, W. (2026). Research on students’ scientific reasoning and argumentation abilities in socio-scientific ıssues context: ıntegrated constructive and critical perspectives. Research in Science Education, 56(2), 603–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10288-4
• Güler, M., Bütüner, S. Ö., Danişman, Ş., & Gürsoy, K. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of mobile learning on mathematics achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1725–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10640-x
• Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
• Hakkarainen, V., King, J., Brundiers, K., Redman, A., Anderson, C. B., Goodall, C. N., Pate, A., & Raymond, C. M. (2024). Online sustainability education: purpose, process and implementation for transformative universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(9), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2023-0227
• Herlinawati, H., Marwa, M., Ismail, N., Junaidi, Liza, L. O., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). The integration of 21st century skills in the curriculum of education. Heliyon, 10(15), e35148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35148
• Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030205
• Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ISJ.12131
• Landolfi, E. (2023). Scientific literacy as part of the science-for-all movement. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 4(1), 20382. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202320382
• Lewis, A. L., & Bader, C. (2026). From frameworks to classrooms: operationalizing sustainability competencies for effective curriculum design in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 27(10), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2025-0148
• Liu, P., Teng, M., & Han, C. (2020). How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors? The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.138126
• Mago, M., Yadav, M., Sharma, S., & Kaur, H. (2025). Environmental knowledge influencing pro-environmental behavior among university students: a serial mediation and MGA approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 26(5), 1072–1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2024-0110
• Markle, G. L. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior: does it matter how it’s measured? Development and validation of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS). Human Ecology, 41(6), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10745-013-9614-8
• Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
• Mateer, T. J., Melton, T. N., Miller, Z. D., Lawhon, B., Agans, J. P., & Taff, B. D. (2022). A multi-dimensional measure of proenvironmental behavior for use across populations with varying levels of environmental involvement in the United States. PLoS ONE, 17(10), e0274083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274083
• Maurer, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Modelling environmental literacy with environmental knowledge, values and (reported) behaviour. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2020.100863
• Muliadi, R., Jatnika, R., Hanami, Y., & Adishesa, M. S. (2025). Evaluation of an environmentally friendly behavior scale among Indonesian university students using the Rasch model. Acta Psychologica, 257, 105087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105087
• Noor, L. (2026). Exploring the role of virtual simulation in advancing sustainable teacher preparation for English learners. Journal of Pedagogical Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202639714
• Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Boeve-de Pauw, J. (2022). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development revisited–a longitudinal study on secondary students’ action competence for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2033170
• O’Toole, J., Benati, K., Beamish, A., Guy, M., & Interrigi, F. (2026). Enhancing critical and creative thinking in sustainability education through reflective practice and project-based learning. The Int ernational Journal of Management Education, 24(2), 101364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJME.2026.101364
• Payan-Carreira, R., Sacau-Fontenla, A., Rebelo, H., Sebastião, L., & Pnevmatikos, D. (2022). Development and validation of a Critical Thinking Assessment-Scale Short Form. Education Sciences, 12(12), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI12120938
• Pessoa, P., Lopes, J. B., de Lima, J., Pinto, A., Søgaard Jørgensen, P., & Sá-Pinto, X. (2024). Evolutionary literacy as a catalyst for sustainable futures: connecting biological evolution education and education for sustainability. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 17(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00213-0
• Priadi, M. A., Lengkana, D., & Yosita, D. (2025). Using PhET simulation as guided inquiry-assisted virtual biology laboratory to enhance science literacy skills of junior high school students in West Lampung. Assimilation, 8(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.17509/AIJBE.V8I1.80287
• Qhobela, M., Makhechane, M., & Ssendija, T. (2026). From pedagogical content knowledge to education for sustainable development: How pre-service physics teachers justify laboratory waste decisions during teaching practice. Sustainable Education and Digital Transformation, 2(1), e29923. https://doi.org/10.33902/SEDT.202629923
• Ramdana, A. D., Munir, & Furqon, C. (2026). Advancing digital literacy in higher education through pedagogical innovations and institutional strategies between 2014 and 2025. Discover Education 2026 5:1, 5(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44217-026-01256-9
• Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021). Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. Frontiers in Education, 6, 785163. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2021.785163
• Saputri, D. Y., Sukarmin, S., Asrowi, A., & Riyadi, R. (2026). Ecopedagogy-based experiential learning model: An effective effort in shaping environmentally concerned attitudes. Journal of Pedagogical Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202638969
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2019.05.003
• Sarstedt, M., & Moisescu, O. I. (2024). Quantifying uncertainty in PLS-SEM-based mediation analyses. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00231-9
• Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Olsson, D., Rieckmann, M., & Gericke, N. (2025). A quality education for sustainability teaching (QUEST) framework: Advancing action competence in sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 56(6), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2025.2542937
• Sopha, B. M. (2013). Sustainable paper consumption: exploring behavioral factors. Social Sciences, 2(4), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI2040270
• Sun, H., Xie, Y., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Exploring the structure of students’ scientific higher order thinking in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100999
• Sziva, D., Berze, I. Z., Cincera, J., Hengerics-Szabó, A., Mónus, F., Rosta, G., Dúll, A., & Varga, A. (2026). Pathways from education for sustainable development to pro-environmental behaviour: the mediating role of action competence. Environmental Education Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2026.2671433
• Tang, T., Vezzani, V., & Eriksson, V. (2020). Developing critical thinking, collective creativity skills and problem solving through playful design jams. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2020.100696
• Teng, J., Xiao, X., Zhang, N., & Yang, S. (2025). Impact of internet use on pro-environmental behaviour mediated by environmental concern. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 5899. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90445-x
• Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE11030054
• Trevisan, L. V., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Dias, B. G., Filho, W. L., & Pedrozo, E. Á. (2024). Digital transformation towards sustainability in higher education: state-of-the-art and future research insights. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 2789–2810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02874-7
• Uluçınar, U., & Sezer, A. (2026). Exploring signs in nature: The vlog experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 8(2), e45073. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202645073
• Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
• Wang, Y., Sommier, M., & Vasques, A. (2022). Sustainability education at higher education institutions: pedagogies and students’ competences. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2021-0465
• Xi, J., & Wang, X. (2022). Development of landscape architecture design students’ pro-environmental awareness by project-based learning. Sustainability, 14(4), 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14042164/S1
• Xie, Y., & Yusuf, A. (2026). Advancing scientific literacy: A systematic review of trends, pedagogies and challenges in the 21st century. Review of Education, 14(1), e70140. https://doi.org/10.1002/REV3.70140
• Yang, C., & Hu, Y. (2026). Rethinking teacher education for sustainable development: A global knowledge mapping and thematic synthesis. International Journal of Educational Development, 122, 103509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103509
• Yang, M., Ren, G., Xiao, Y., & Guo, L. (2026). The impact of digital literacy on green consumption behavior under the moderation of prosocial behavior. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 4459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34459-5
• Yao, X., & Lin, L. (2026). Reframing digital literacy: current paradigms, core challenges, and future research directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1), 1130-. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07496-2
• Yarmi, G., Putra, Z. F. F., Sakmal, J., Marini, A., Safitri, D., Dewiyani, L., Julia, V., Saputro, R. H., Muharrani, N. P., & Marfu, A. (2026). Education sustainability in digital project based learning the role of creative intelligence on innovative abilities with a dual approach using PLS SEM and Pareto analysis. Discover Sustainability, 7(1), 621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02815-8
• Zhang, J., & Cao, A. (2025). The psychological mechanisms of education for sustainable development: environmental attitudes, self-efficacy, and social norms as mediators of pro-environmental behavior among university students. Sustainability, 17(3), 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU17030933
• Zhang, Y., Du, J., & Boamah, K. B. (2023). Green climate and pro-environmental behavior: Addressing attitude-behavior gaps towards promoting sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2428–2445. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.2520

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.