Technological pedagogical knowledge self-efficacy and continuance intention of Philippine teachers in remote education amid COVID-19 crisis
Michael B. Cahapay 1 * , Jeorge Louie D. Anoba 2
More Detail
1 Mindanao State University, College of Education, Philippines
2 City Schools Division of Koronadal, Department of Education, Philippines
* Corresponding Author


With the sudden and forced change to various modalities of remote education amid the COVID-19 crisis, the technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) self-efficacy and continuance intention of teachers demand an investigation. This article aimed to assess the TPK self-efficacy and continuance intention of teachers in remote education amid the COVID-19 crisis. Employing a quantitative correlational research design, it involved a randomly selected sample of 1065 K to 12 teachers from Mindanao, Philippines. Two psychometrically tested scales were used to gather the needed data. The analyses were performed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The result indicated that the teachers have high levels of TPK self-efficacy and continuance intention. It further revealed that TPK self-efficacy significantly differed across age, gender, marital status, monthly income, educational attainment, and teaching experience, and continuance intention across age, monthly income, and teaching position. Lastly, the results uncovered a significant positive relationship between TPK self-efficacy and continuance intention of teachers. This study provides implications on the sustained technology use in Philippine education. The theoretical and practical contributions are also discussed in the study. 



  • Alea, L. A., Fabrea, M. F., Roldan, R. D. A., & Farooqi, A. Z. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 awareness, distance learning education experiences and perceptions towards institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127-144.
  • Anoba, J. L. D. & Cahapay, M. B. (2020). The Readiness of Teachers on Blended Learning Transition for Post-COVID-19 Period: An Assessment Using Parallel Mixed Method. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(2), 295-316.
  • Bai, B., Wang, J., & Chai, C. S. (2019). Understanding Hong Kong primary school English teachers’ continuance intention to teach with ICT. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 528-551.
  • Black, M. R. (2019). A comparative analysis of teacher efficacy scores of online business faculty based on educational background [Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University].
  • Butucha, K. (2013). Gender and school type differences in self-efficacy in teaching. Sky Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 23-31.
  • Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133-153.
  • Chauhan, S., Goyal, S., Bhardwaj, A. K., & Sergi, B. S. (2021). Examining continuance intention in business schools with digital classroom methods during COVID-19: a comparative study of India and Italy. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-24.
  • Chiu, C. M., & Wang, E. T. (2008). Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194-201.
  • Chu, R. J. C. (2010). How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults–Analyses of gender and age differences. Computers & Education, 55(1), 255-264.
  • Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021). COVID-19 and higher education: first-year students’ expectations toward distance learning. Sustainability, 13(4), 1889.
  • Cui, Y. (2021, January). The influence of quality factors on the satisfaction and continuance intention of chinese college students' online learning during the COVID-19 epidemic. In K.-C. Chen (Ed.), 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 145-150). ICPS.
  • Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 33-43.
  • Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C.S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the Structural Relationship among Teachers’ Technostress, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Computer Self-Efficacy and School Support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 147-157.
  • Dotong, C.I., De Castro, E.L., Dolot, J.A., & Prenda, M.T.B. (2016). Barriers for educational technology integration in contemporary classroom environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(2), 13-20.
  • Durak, H.Y. (2019). Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-27.
  • Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53(2), 279-295.
  • Han, M., Wu, J., Wang, Y., & Hong, M. (2018). A model and empirical study on the user’s continuance intention in online China brand communities based on customer-perceived benefits. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(4), 46.
  • Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Education, 118, 107-119.
  • Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139-154.
  • Horvitz, B., Beach, A., Anderson, M., & Xia, J. (2014). Examination of Faculty Self-efficacy Related to Online Teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 305-316.
  • Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1-35.
  • International Association of Universities. (2020, April 25). COVID-19: Higher education challenges and responses [Report]. challenges-and-responses
  • Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102183.
  • Ismail, N. Z., Razak, M. R., Zakariah, Z., Alias, N., & Aziz, M. N. A. (2012). E-learning continuance intention among higher learning institution students’ in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 409-415.
  • Jang, S., & Liu, Y. (2019). Continuance use intention with mobile augmented reality games. Information Technology & People, 33(1), 37-55.
  • Johnson, R. T. (2020). Beginning Teachers' Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Based on Level of Technology Infusion in the Undergraduate Program [Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University].
  • Kiray, S.A. (2016). Development of a TPACK self-efficacy scale for preservice science teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 527- 541.
  • Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756.
  • Lai, H. M., Hsiao, Y. L., & Hsieh, P. J. (2018). The role of motivation, ability, and opportunity in university teachers’ continuance use intention for flipped teaching. Computers & Education, 124, 37-50.
  • Lau F. (2007). Chapter 12: Methods for correlational studies. In Lau F, Kuziemsky C (Eds.), Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach. University of Victoria.
  • Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vols. 1-0). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Lazar, I., Panisoara, I., Panisoara, G., Chirca, R., & Ursu, A. (2020). Motivation and continuance intention towards online instruction among teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating effect of burnout and technostress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8002.
  • Lin, T. J. (2021). Exploring the differences in Taiwanese university students’ online learning task value, goal orientation, and self-efficacy before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 191-203.
  • Lin, K. M., Chen, N. S., & Fang, K. (2011) Understanding e- learning continuance intention: A negative critical incidents perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 77-89.
  • Lin, X., Featherman, M., & Sarker, S. (2017). Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective. Information & Management, 54(3), 383-395.
  • Luz, J. M. (2020, August 01). 3 case studies: How ready are Philippine schools for distance learning? Rappler. Retrieved from
  • Mallillin, L. L. D., Mendoza, L. C., Mallillin, J. B., Felix, R. C., & Lipayon, I. C. (2020). Implementation and readiness of online learning pedagogy: a transition to COVID 19 pandemic. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(2), 71-90.
  • Ma, K., Chutiyami, M., Zhang, Y., & Nicoll, S. (2021). Online teaching self-efficacy during COVID-19: Changes, its associated factors and moderators. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
  • Mo, C. Y., Hsieh, T. H., Lin, C. L., Jin, Y. Q., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Exploring the critical factors, the online learning continuance usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(10), 5471.
  • Nikou, S. A. (2021). Web-based videoconferencing for teaching online: Continuance intention to use in the post-COVID-19 period. Interaction Design and Architecture, 47, 123-143.
  • Obana, J. (2020, March 18). Could educational technology be a „holy grail‟ amid Covid-19 crisis? The Manila Times.
  • Penrose, A., Perry, C., & Ball, I. (2007). Emotional intelligence and teacher self efficacy: The contribution of teacher status and length of experience. Issues in Educational Research, 17(1), 107-126.
  • Robinia, K. A. (2008). online teaching self-efficacy of nurse faculty teaching in public, accredited nursing programs in the state of Michigan [Doctoral Dissertation, Western Michigan University]
  • Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585–1604.
  • Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students' ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103-116.
  • Santi, E. A., Gorghiu, G., & Pribeanu, C. (2020). Teachers' perceived self-efficacy for mobile teaching and learning. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12.
  • Sousa, V. D., Driessnack, M., & Mendes, I. A. C. (2007). An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 1: quantitative research designs. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15(3), 502-507.
  • Tang, J. T. E., Tang, T. I., & Chiang, C. H. (2014). Blog learning: effects of users' usefulness and efficiency towards continuance intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 36-50.
  • Tweed, S. R. (2013). Technology implementation: Teacher age, experience, self-efficacy, and professional development as related to classroom technology integration (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
  • United Nations (2021). Pandemic disruption to learning is an opportunity to reimagine, revitalize education. UN News. Retrieved from
  • Wang, L. Y. K., Lew, S. L., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon, 5(6), e01788.
  • Wang, T., Lin, C. L., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 4586.
  • World Bank (2020, June 18). COVID-19 Could lead to permanent loss in learning and trillions of dollars in lost earnings.
  • Yang, C. (2021). Online teaching self-efficacy, social–emotional learning (SEL) competencies, and compassion fatigue among educators during the COVID-19 pandemic. School Psychology Review, 1-14.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.