Abstract

English is required in Indonesian higher education, yet foreign language readers find academic texts difficult, and many low-English-proficient students have foreign language anxiety. This study examined the impact of modified collaborative strategic reading integrated with visual-syntactic text formatting on foreign language reading comprehension and reading anxiety among Indonesian university students. Using a non-equivalent control group design, 101 first-year students were assigned to an experimental group receiving the combined intervention or a control group receiving conventional instruction over eight weeks. Data were collected through a standardized reading comprehension test and the Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale. Statistical results showed that the experimental group achieved significantly higher reading comprehension scores, with the strongest improvements in identifying main ideas, locating detailed information, interpreting references, and recognizing authorial purpose, and moderate gains in inference and vocabulary. Test resulst also indicated a significant reduction in reading anxiety for the experimental group. Qualitative findings revealed that collaborative strategy use enhanced comprehension monitoring, awareness of text structure, and learner confidence, while visual-syntactic formatting reduced cognitive load by clarifying complex sentence structures. Overall, the integrated approach effectively supported lower-proficiency English as a Foreign Language readers and provides a scalable model for improving academic literacy in higher education.  

Keywords

References

• Abbasnezhad, S., & Zoghi, M. (2016). The effect of modified collaborative strategic reading on EFL learners’ reading anxiety. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 9(18), 25–48.
• Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.
• Alharbi, S. H. (2021). The struggling English language learners: Case studies of English language learning difficulties in EFL contexts. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p108
• Al-khresheh, M. H., & Al Basheer Ben Ali, R. (2023). A mixed method study on the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies used by Saudi EFL students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202321535
• Anggraini, M. P., Cahyono, B. Y., Anugerahwati, M., & Ivone, F. M. (2022). The interaction effects of reading proficiency and personality types on EFL university students’ online reading strategy use. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 8821–8839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10979-9
• Aukerman, M., & Schuldt, L. C. (2021). What matters most? Toward a robust and socially just science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S85–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.406
• Babapour, M., Ahangari, S., & Ahour, T. (2018). The effect of shadow reading and collaborative strategic reading on EFL learners’ reading comprehension across two proficiency levels. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1465059
• Baker, T., & Clark, J. (2010). Cooperative learning—A double-edged sword: A cooperative learning model for use with diverse student groups. Intercultural Education, 21(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675981003760440
• Bryant, D. P., & Lehr, F. (2001). Research-based content area reading instruction. Texas Education Agency.
• Chang, Y.-N., Taylor, J. S. H., Rastle, K., & Monaghan, P. (2020). The relationships between oral language and reading instruction: Evidence from a computational model of reading. Cognitive Psychology, 123, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101336
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Dang, V. T. T. (2024). English foreign language reading anxiety and reading strategies: A positive or negative correlation? SAGE Open, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241279663
• Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
• Fahmi, A., Mukminatien, N., Ginting, D., & Kusumaningrum, S. R. (2024). The impact of flipping class intervention on reading comprehension: Different approaches and proficiency levels. PLOS ONE, 19(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305041
• Fotovatian, S., & Shokrpour, N. (2007). Comparison of the efficiency of reading comprehension strategies on Iranian university students’ comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2007.10850197
• Gao, W., Namaziandost, E., & Abdulaal, M. A. A. (2022). Visual-syntactic text formatting: Developing EFL learners’ reading fluency components. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09834-8
• Ghavamnia, M., & Kashkouli, Z. (2022). Motivation, engagement, strategy use, and L2 reading proficiency in Iranian EFL learners: An investigation of relations and predictability. Reading Psychology, 43(7), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2113943
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
• Hall, C. S. (2015). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9295-x
• Han, F. (2021). The relations between motivation, strategy use, frequency, and proficiency in foreign language reading: An investigation with university English language learners in China. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008423
• Hasan, M. K., & Shabdin, A. A. (2017). The correlation and contribution of depth of vocabulary knowledge to reading success of EFL Bangladeshi tertiary students. PASAA, 53(1), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.53.1.6
• Herbert, J. C. (2014). The effects of syntactically parsed text formats on intensive reading in EFL. The JALT CALL Journal, 10(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v10n3.j178
• Hong-Nam, K., & Page, L. (2014). Investigating metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use of EFL Korean university students. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.675418
• Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480999036X
• Hossain, K. I. (2024). Literature-based language learning: Challenges and opportunities for English learners. Ampersand, 13(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100201
• Hwang, I., & Bae, J. (2022). Foreign language reading anxiety and reading comprehension of Korean secondary EFL students. Secondary English Education, 15(4), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.15.4.202211.35
• Kalbfleisch, E., Schmitt, E., & Zipoli, R. P. (2021). Empirical insights into college students’ academic reading comprehension in the United States. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(3), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.18676699
• Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52(7), 738–747. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20204676
• Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/461914
• Kobayashi, M. (2002). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organization and response format. Language Testing, 19(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt227oa
• Lee, D., Allen, M., Cheng, L., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Exploring relationships between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies of English language learners in a college setting. Journal of International Students, 11(3), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v11i3.2145
• Li, L., Yu, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, X., Guan, Q., Luo, Y., & Li, H. (2024). Electrophysiological evidence of lexical processing impacted by foreign language reading anxiety. Heliyon, 10(9), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30061
• Li, R. (2022). Foreign language reading anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 35, 995–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10213-x
• Limeranto, J. T., & Subekti, A. S. (2021). Indonesian theology students’ foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance: A correlational study. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17398
• Ma, Y., & Lin, W. (2015). A study on the relationship between English reading comprehension and English vocabulary knowledge. Linguistics and Language Teaching, 2015, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/209154
• Marnola, I., Degeng, I. N. S., Ulfa, S., & Praherdhiono, H. (2025). Instructional model design of project-based collaborative online learning on an online discussion forum. The Journal of English and Education (JEO), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.2.8
• Masrai, A. (2019). Vocabulary and reading comprehension revisited: Evidence for high-, mid-, and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019845182
• Mercan, N., Bulut, M., & Yüksel, Ç. (2023). Investigation of the relatedness of cognitive distortions with emotional expression, anxiety, and depression. Current Psychology, 42, 2176–2185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02251-z
• Mesmer, H. A. (2024). Time in text: Differentiating instruction for intermediate students struggling with word recognition. The Reading Teacher, 77(6), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2332
• Namaziandost, E., Nasri, M., & Ziafar, M. (2019). Comparing the impacts of various inputs (I + 1 & I − 1) on pre-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension and reading motivation: The case of Ahvazi learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4,  13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0079-1
• Ntereke, B. B., & Ramoroka, B. T. (2017). Reading competency of first-year undergraduate students at University of Botswana: A case study. Reading & Writing: Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v8i1.123
• Nurisma, R. A., Dewi, O. T. S., Irawati, R., Sari, R., Suryati, N., & Widiati, U. (2025). Language assessment literacy in online EFL reading class: What novice and experienced teachers reveal. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 26(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.54855/callej.252619
• Ozaki, S., & Ueda, I. (2020). The effects of digital scaffolding on adolescent English reading in Japan: An experimental study on visual-syntactic text formatting. JALT CALL Journal, 16(3), 147–165.
• Park, Y., & Oh, R. (2018). The effects of syntactic enhancement on EFL reading fluency for secondary school students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27, 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0389-y
• Park, Y., Xu, Y., Collins, P., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Scaffolding learning of language structures with visual‑syntactic text formatting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1896–1912. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12689
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). Introduction to emotions in education. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 1–10). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148211
• Saadatnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2016). EFL learners’ levels of comprehension across text structures: A comparison of literal and inferential comprehension of descriptive and enumerative expository texts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(6), 1499–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9414-6
• Saadatnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2017). Levels of reading comprehension across text types: A comparison of literal and inferential comprehension of expository and narrative texts in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9481-3
• Saito, Y., Horwitz, E. K., & Garza, T. J. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00016
• Song, J. (2018). Examining the relationships among foreign language reading anxiety, reading processing, and reading comprehension. Foreign Languages Education, 25(2), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.15334/FLE.2018.25.2.83
• Srisang, P., & Everatt, J. (2021). Lower and higher level comprehension skills of undergraduate EFL learners and their reading comprehension. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 427–454.
• Tate, T. P., Collins, P., Xu, Y., Yau, J. C., Krishnan, J., Prado, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Visual-syntactic text format: Improving adolescent literacy. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(4), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1561700
• Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of children’s metacognitive knowledge, reading, and writing in English as a foreign language: Evidence from longitudinal data using multilevel models. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1202–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12413
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Walker, S., Schloss, P., Fletcher, C. R., Vogel, C. A., & Walker, R. C. (2005). Visual-syntactic text formatting: A new method to enhance online reading. Reading Online, 8(6). http://www.readingonline.org/
• Wang, D. (2009). Factors affecting the comprehension of global and local main idea. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39(2), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2009.10850317
• Warschauer, M., Park, Y., & Walker, R. (2011). Transforming digital reading with visual-syntactic text formatting. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v7n3.121
• Xia, Z., Chen, C.-H., & Kuo, J.-Y. (2025). How do stress situations affect higher-level text processing in L1 and L2 readers? An eye-tracking study. Electronics, 18(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics18020007
• Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. M. (2010). Collaborative Strategic Reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850336
• Zoghi, M., Azman, H., & Tengku Mohamad Maasum, T. N. R. (2006). CSR II: An instructional technique for reading strategies [Paper presentation]. SoLLs.INTEC.07, Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.