Abstract

This study examines how a data science learning module can be added to a middle school programming curriculum for gifted students. Six gifted students participated in a seven-week program focused on data science using Python programming. We conducted semi-structured interviews with the students’ information technology teacher before and after the implementation. The insights from these interviews guided our course design. Next, we implemented a seven-week data science teaching module, in which students used Python to analyze real digital game data. We explored students’ progress through audio recordings and observations in class. Although the students initially lacked statistical knowledge, they successfully used Python to apply statistical concepts to data sets. The teacher suggested including more data science topics, especially machine learning. The results indicate that adding data science content to middle school programming curricula can improve gifted students’ statistical reasoning thanks to practical coding experiences. Additionally, this integration might encourage teachers to explore topics like machine learning, highlighting the benefits of combining different subjects in education. 

Keywords

References

• Albaili, M. (2003). Motivational goal orientations of intellectually gifted achieving and underachieving students in the United Arab Emirates. Social Behavior and Personality, 31(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.1.107
• Aloufi, F., Tashtoush, M. A., Shirawia, N., Tashtoush, R. A., Az-Zo’bi, E. A., & Arabia, S. (2024). Internet of Things in education: Teachers’ perspectives, practices and challenges. WSEAS Transactions on Computer Research, 12, 429–442. https://doi.org/10.37394/232018.2024.12.42
• Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2000). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge.
• Aslan, O. (2022). Comparison of critical thinking dispositions of gifted students in support education (enrolled with SACs) and formal education. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(4), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1212406
• Avcu, Y., E., & Ayverdi L. (2022). Application of design thinking as a differentiation strategy for the education of gifted students: "City X” Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 10(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1183220
• Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. E. (2020). Design thinking applications in teaching programming to gifted students. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 3(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.671621
• Baccassino, F., & Pinnelli, S. (2023). Giftedness and gifted education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1073007. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1073007
• Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. A. (2020). Pre-K–12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II): A framework for statistics and data science education. American Statistical Association.
• Bozan, İ., & Savi Çakar, F. (2020). Determination of the problems experienced by Science and Art Center teachers and their suggestions for solutions to these problems. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 15(3), 1607–1628. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.39986
• Brigandi, C. B., Weiner, J. M., Siegle, D., Gubbins, E. J., & Little, C. A. (2018). Environmental perceptions of gifted secondary school students engaged in an evidence-based enrichment practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218758441
• Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vols. 1–2). University of Iowa, International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
• Coleman, M. R., & Hughes, C. E. (2009). Meeting the needs of gifted students within an RtI framework. Gifted Child Today, 32(3), 1–417.
• Coleman, L. J., Micko, K. J., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Twenty-five years of research on the lived experience of being gifted in school: capturing the students’ voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215607322
• Costello, P. J. M. (2007). Action research. London: Continuum Books.
• Çetin, A., & Doğan, A. (2018). Problems encountered by mathematics teachers working in science and art centers. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Special Education Magazine, 19(4), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.370355
• Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Ellison, V. (2020). A fresh look at introductory data science. Journal of Statistics Education, 29(S1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1804497
• Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., Diez, D., & Barr, C. (2022). Data science in a box: Teaching materials for introductory data science. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 30(1), 1–6.
• Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2014). Underachievement: Identification and reversal. In G. A. Davis, S., B. Rimm, & D. Siegle (Eds.), Education of the gifted and talented (pp. 291–326). Pearson.
• Dimitriadis, C. (2011). Provision for mathematically gifted children in primary schools: An investigation of four different methods of organizational provision. Educational Review, 64(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.598920
• English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2019). STEM integration in sixth grade: Designing and constructing paper bridges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 863–884.
• Erdem, E. (2018). The investigation of the effects of coding education on students' computer programming self-efficacy and attitudes about coding. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(6), 128–138.
• Fox, J., & Farmer, M. (2011). The effect of computer programming education on the reasoning skills of high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 415–428.
• Gould, R. (2021). Toward data‐scientific thinking. Teaching Statistics, 43, S11–S22. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12267
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In S. Sentence, E. Barendsen, & C. Schulte (Eds.), Computer science education: perspectives on teaching and learning (pp. 19–38). Bloomsbury Academic.
• Israel, M., Wherfel, Q. M., Pearson, J., Shehab, S., & Tapia, T. (2015). Empowering K–12 students with disabilities to learn computational thinking and computer programming. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594790
• İlik, S. S. (2019). Evaluation of the opinions of teachers working in the education of gifted students about preparing, implementing and monitoring individualized education programs. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(2), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2569
• Karaduman, G. B. (2010). Differentiated mathematics education programs for gifted students. Hasan Ali Yücel Education Faculty Journal, 13(1), 1–12.
• Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607
• Konold, C., Higgins, T., Russell, S. J., & Khalil, K. (2015). Data seen through different lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9529-8
• Kontaş, H., Yağcı, E. (2016). The effectiveness of the program developed for the program development needs of BİLSEM teachers. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(3), 902–923.
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
• Krutetski, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. The University of Chicago Press.
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2007). Contrasting emerging conceptions of distribution in contexts of error and natural variation. In Thinking with data (pp. 163–190). Psychology Press.
• Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2018). Computational thinking in secondary education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 2(1), 41–60.
• Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 1–15.
• Martin, A. J. (2005). Exploring the effects of a youth enrichment program on academic motivation and engagement. Social Psychology of Education, 8(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-6487-0
• Memarian, B., Doleck, T. (2024). Data science pedagogical tools and practices: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8179–8201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12102-y
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2015). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönetmeliği [Directive on science and art centers]. Author.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Özel eğitim hizmetleri yönetmeliği [Special Education Services Regulation]. Author.
• Öngöz, S., & Sözel, H. K. (2018). Üstün yeteneklilerin eğitiminde teknoloji kullanımı [Use of technology in the education of gifted students]. In H. F. Odabaşı (Ed.), Özel eğitim ve eğitim teknolojisi [Special education and educational technology] (pp. 91–114). Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052411773
• Özdemir, D. (2016). Design and development of differentiated tasks for 5th and 6th grade mathematically gifted students (Publication no. 439228) [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
• Özdemir, D. & Isiksal Bostan, M. (2021). A design based study: characteristics of differentiated tasks for mathematically gifted students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/10995
• Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244
• Pršala, J. (2024). The effect of block-based programming activities on the computational thinking skills of pre-service primary school teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202426267
• Psycharis, S., & Kallia, M. (2017). The effects of computer programming on high school students’ reasoning skills and mathematical self-efficacy and problem solving. Instructional Science, 45(5), 583–602.
• Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: a how-to guide for talent development (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003238904
• Rosenberg, J., & Jones, R. S. (2024). Data science learning in grades K–12: synthesizing research across divides. Harvard Data Science Review, 6(3), https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.b1233596
• Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. Handbook of Gifted Education, 3, 163–173.
• Sırakaya, M. (2019). The effect of block-based programming on the computational thinking skills of middle school students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 52–65.
• Smedsrud, J. H., Bungum, B., & Egeland Flø, E. (2024). Gifted students’ experiences with participation in makerspace enrichment programs at talent centers in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 1080–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2394388
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39–53.
• Şen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kıray, S. A. (2021). Computational thinking skills of gifted and talented students in integrated STEM activities based on the engineering design process. The case of robotics and 3D robot modeling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100931
• Takayama, T. (2025). Mathematical thinking in programming education: Applied to the solution of linear equations in Junior high school. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 6(1), 20935. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202520935
• Taylor, J., Harlow, A., & Forret, M. (2010). Using a computer programming environment and an interactive whiteboard to investigate some mathematical thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 561–570.
• Tortop, H. S. (2012). Radical acceleration in educational process of highly gifted students and the situation of Turkiye. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(2), 106–113.
• Tortop, H. S. (2015). Üstün zekâlılar eğitiminde farklılaştırılmış öğretim müfredat farklılaştırma modelleri [Differentiated instruction and curriculum differentiation models in gifted education]. Genç Bilge Publishing.
• Tsai, K., & Fu, G. (2016). Underachievement in gifted students: A case study of three college physics students in Taiwan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040405
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Baska, A. (2019). Curriculum planning and ınstructional design for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003234050
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (2011). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Prufrock Press.
• Vargas-Montoya, L., Gimenez, G. & Tkacheva, L. (2024). Only gifted students benefit from ICT use at school in mathematics learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8301–8326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12136-2
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 3335.
• Yurdakök, Y. (2022). The effect of Python programming language education on middle school students’ self-efficacy perceptions of programming. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1), 80–92.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.