A comparison of teacher induction systems in Türkiye, China, New Zealand, and Germany
Tuğba Baran Kaya 1 * , Adnan Baki 2
More Detail
1 Kırıkkale University, Education Faculty, Kırıkkale, Türkiye
2 Trabzon University, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon, Türkiye
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare Turkish novice teacher induction system with China, New Zealand, and Germany in terms of assignment to teaching, duration of induction, and opportunities provided in programs. Those countries selected are known to have the best practices for induction training. Despite their differing policies regarding novice teacher training, they provide novice teachers with many exemplary aspects of support. The comparison shows that collaboration activities are formalized in three countries, except Türkiye. While novice teachers in Türkiye have the same workload as experienced teachers, novices in the other three countries have a reduced workload and have more free time for education. A mentoring program is being conducted in all countries, including Türkiye. Türkiye has weekly seminars on liberal education topics, while the other three countries have mostly branch-specific seminars. The paper concludes with a discussion of the educational implications of the induction programs.

Keywords

References

  • Aitken, H., Ferguson, B. P., McGrath, F., Piggot-Irvine, E. & Ritchie, J. (2008). Learning to teach: Success case studies of teacher induction in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Teachers Council.
  • Aktekin, S. (2016). Öğretmen yetiştirme ve geliştirme genel müdürü Doç. Dr. Semih Aktekin ile aday öğretmen yetiştirme süreci üzerine [Candidate teacher training process with Assoc. Dr. Semih Aktekin, general manager of teacher training and development]. Retrieved June 22, 2021 from https://tedmem.org/dosya-konusu/ogretmen-yetistirme-ve-gelistirme-genel-mudurudoc-dr-semih-aktekin-ile-aday-ogretmen-yetistirme-sureci-uzerine
  • Altıntaş, S. & Görgen, İ. (2017). Preservice teachers’ reviews on preservice teacher training system. Turkish Studies, 12(6), 15-30. http://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11559
  • Avenarius, H. & Heckel, H. (2000). Schulrechtskunde: ein Handbuch für Praxis, Rechtsprechung und Wissenschaft [School law: a handbook for practice, jurisprudence and science]. Luchterhand.
  • Ayvaz-Düzyol, M. (2012). The effectiveness of induction program for candidate teachers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Baki, A. & Bektaş-Baki, B. (2016). Türkiye ve Almanya'nın ortaokul matematik öğretmeni yetiştirme programlarının karşılaştırması [Comparison of secondary school mathematics teacher training programs in Turkey and Germany]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 229-258.
  • Baran-Kaya, T. (2019). Evaluation of novice elementary mathematics teachers’ experiences in the induction program [Unpublished doctoral dissertation)]. Trabzon University, Trabzon.
  • Beijaard, D., Buitink, J. & Kessels, C. (2010). Teacher induction. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGraw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of education (pp. 563- 568). Elsevier.
  • Benade, L. (2017). Being a teacher in the 21st century: A critical New Zealand research study. Springer.
  • Bereday, G. (1964). Comparative method in education. Rinehart & Winston.
  • Bleach, K. (2012). Induction and mentoring of newly qualified teachers: A new deal for teachers. David Fulton Publishers.
  • Blömeke, S. & Klein, P. (2013). When is a school environment perceived as supportive by beginning mathematics teachers? Effects of leadership, trust, autonomy and appraisal on teaching quality. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 1029-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9424-x
  • Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Busse, A., Kaiser, G. & König, J. (2015). Teacher change during induction: Development of beginning primary teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and performance. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9619-4
  • Bond, S. (2012). Perceptions of support, induction, and intentions by secondary science and mathematics teachers on job retention [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Bray, M. (2005). Methodology and focus in comparative education. In M. Bray and R. Koo (Eds.), Education and society in Hong Kong and Macao (pp. 239-252). Springer.
  • Brinkmann, H. & Kropp, U. (2012). Der reformierte Vorbereitungsdienst: Die neue Staatsprüfung [The Reformed Preparatory Service. The new state exam]. Schule NRW, 63(3), 126-128.
  • Britton, E. D. (2006). Mentoring in the induction systems of five countries: A sum greater than its parts. In C. Cullingford (Ed.), Mentoring in education: An international perspective (pp. 107-120). Ashgate Publishing.
  • Britton, E. D., Paine, L., Pimm, D. & Raizen, S. (2003a). Introduction. In E. Britton, L. Paine, D. Pimm & S. Raizen (Eds.), Comprehensive teacher induction (pp. 20-82). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Britton, E., Raizen, S. & Huntley, M. A. (2003b). Help in every direction: Supporting beginning science teachers in New Zealand. In E. Britton, L. Paine, D. Pimm and S. Raizen (Eds.), Comprehensive teacher induction (pp. 141-193). Kluwer Academıc Publishers.
  • Britton, T. & Paine, L. (2005). Applying ideas from other countries. In H. Portner (Ed.), Teacher mentoring and induction (pp. 225-239). Corwin Press.
  • Broadley G. & Broadley K. M. (2004). The employment styles of school principals recruiting beginning teachers. Educational Research, 46(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000277322
  • Brundrett, M., Fitzgerald, T. & Sommefeldt, D. (2006). The creation of national programmes of school leadership development in England and New Zealand: A comparative study. International Studies in Educational Administration, 34(1), 89–105.
  • Cai, J. & Wang, T. (2006). U.S. and Chinese teachers’ conceptions and constructions of representations: A case of teaching ratio concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 145–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9006-7
  • Cai, J. & Wang, T. (2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 265 – 287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9132-1
  • Cakmak, M., Gunduz, M., & Emstad, A. B. (2019). Challenging moments of novice teachers: Survival strategies developed through experiences. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1476465
  • Cameron, M. (2007). Learning to teach. A literature review of induction theory and practice. New Zealand Teachers Council.
  • Cameron, M., Baker, R. & Lovett, S. (2006). Teachers of promise: Getting started in teaching. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
  • Cameron, M., Dingle, R. & Brooking, K. (2007). Learning to teach: A survey of provisionally registered teachers in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Teachers Council.
  • Carver, C. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2009). Using policy to improve teacher induction: Critical elements and missing pieces. Educational Policy, 23(2), 295-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807310036
  • Clement, M.C. (2000). Making time for teacher induction: A lesson from the New Zealand model. The Clearing House, 73(6), 329-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009599437
  • Collinson, V. & Ono, Y. (2001). The professional development of teachers in the United States and Japan. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760120095615
  • Çepni, S. (2012). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project studies]. Celepler Matbaacılık.
  • Çubukçu, Z., Yılmaz, B. Y. & İnci, T. (2016). Determination of comparative curriculum research trends - a content analysis. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 5(1), 446-468.
  • Dağ, N. & Sarı, M. H. (2017). Areas of mentoring needs of novice and preservice teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131892
  • Decker, A. T., Kunter, M. & Voss, T. (2015). The relationship between quality of discourse during teacher induction classes and beginning teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0227-4
  • Dewar, S., Kennedy, S., Staig, C. & Cox, L. (2003). Recruitment and retention in New Zealand secondary schools: Information from a series of interviews, with a focus on beginning teachers, returning teachers, and heads of departments. New Zealand Ministry of Education.
  • Dias-Lacy, S. L. & Guirguis, R. V. (2017). Challenges for new teachers and ways of coping with them. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), 265-272.
  • Erdemir, N. (2007). The problems and complaints fased by science teachers who are new in their profession. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 6(22), 135-149.
  • European Commission. (2004). The teaching profession in Europe: Profile, trends and concerns Report IV: Keeping teaching attractive for the 21st century. Eurydice.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 6(103), 1013-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141
  • Fresko, B., & Nasser-Abu Alhija, F. (2015). Induction seminars as professional learning communities for beginning teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.928267
  • Friedrichsen, P., Chval, K. B. & Teuscher, D. (2007). Strategies and sources of support for beginning teachers of science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 107(5), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17781.x
  • Fulton, K., Yoon, I. & Lee, C. (2005). Induction into learning communities. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
  • Gellert, U. (2008). Routines and collective orientations in mathematics teachers’ professional development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9089-x
  • Gerdes, R. & Annas-Sieler, D. (2011). Der reformierte Vorbereitungsdienst. Neue Lehrerausbildung in NRW [The Reformed Induction Program. New teacher training in NRW]. Schule NRW, 9, 454–457.
  • Gordon, S. P. (1991). How to help beginning teachers succeed.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Gökulu, A. (2017). Prospective teachers’ views about the prospective teacher training process in Turkey. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(1), 111-123.
  • Grudnoff, L. (2012). All’s well? New Zealand beginning teachers’ experience of induction provision in their first six months in school. Professional Development in Education, 38(3), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.636894
  • Guo, S. & Pungur, L. (2008). Exploring teacher education in the context of Canada and China: A cross-cultural dialogue. Frontiers of Education in China, 3(2), 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-008-0016-4
  • Gülay, A. & Altun, T. (2017). Determining perceptions of newly qualified teachers about their professional competencies and challenges. Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Journal of Faculty of Education, 31, 738-749.
  • Güler, M. (2019). A model proposal for developing teaching knowledge of novice middle-school mathematics teachers: mentoring practice program [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Trabzon University, Trabzon.
  • Güler, M., & Çelik, D. (2022). Supporting novice mathematics teachers: The impact of e-mentoring on lesson analysis skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103658
  • Haigh, M. A. & Anthony, G. J. (2012). Induction and efficacy: A case study of New Zealand newly qualified secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 651-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9285-0
  • Hamad, A. R. (2013). Comparative education on the map of teacher preparation programme in Kuwait. College Student Journal, 47(2), 292-305.
  • Han, X. (2012). Big moves to improve the quality of teacher education in China. On the Horizon, 20(4), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121211272461
  • Han, X. (2013). Improving classroom instruction with apprenticeship practices and public lesson development as contexts. In Y. Li and R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching (pp. 171-185). Routledge.
  • Han, X. & Paine, L. (2010). Teaching math as deliberate practice through public lessons. Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 519 – 541. https://doi.org/10.1086/651194
  • Hangül, Ş. (2017). An evaluation of the new teacher ınduction program in Turkey through the eyes of beginning teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(10), 191-201.
  • Higgins, J., & Parsons, R. (2009). A successful professional development model in mathematics: A system-wide New Zealand case. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109336894
  • Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00195.x
  • Huang, J. (2018). Pre-Service teacher education and induction in Southwest China. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Huang, R., Li Y. & He, X. (2010) What constitutes effective mathematics instruction: A comparison of Chinese expert and novice teachers’ views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(4), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.524965
  • Huang, R., Ye, L. & Prince, K. (2017). Professional development of secondary mathematics teachers in Mainland China. In B. Kaur et al. (Eds.), Professional development of mathematics teachers (pp. 17-31). Springer.
  • Huang, X. (2018). Teacher education in professional learning communities: Lessons from the reciprocal learning project. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations. University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  • Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60, 30-33.
  • İlyas, İ. E., Coşkun, İ. & Toklucu, D. (2017). Türkiye’de aday öğretmen yetiştirme modeli: İzleme ve değerlendirme [Novice teacher training model in Turkey: Monitoring and evaluation]. SETA Pub.
  • Jensen, B., Sandoval-Hernández, A., Knoll, S., & Gonzalez, E. J. (2012). The experience of new teachers: Results from TALIS 2008. OECD.
  • Kaur, B., Kwon, O. & Leong, Y. (2017). Professional development of mathematics teachers. Mathematics education: An Asian perspective. Springer
  • Kaygusuz, H. N. (2020). Mentorship applications in professional development of prospective classroom teachers: A case study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya.
  • Keleş, F. (2019). An investigation of the knowledge of mathematics teachers of primary school teachers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Trabzon University, Trabzon.
  • Kılıç, D., Babayiğit, Ö. & Erkuş, B. (2016). The views of teacher candidates about candidacy training. Ekev Journal of Academy, 20(68), 81-91.
  • KMK. (2017). The education system in the federal Republic of Germany 2015/2016. Retrieved February 20, 2022 from https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Eurydice/Bildungswesen-engl.pdfs/dossier_en_ebook.pdf
  • Kocadağ, Y. (2001). Training problems of trainee teachers on service [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ankara University, Ankara.
  • Kozikoğlu, İ. & Senemoğlu, N. (2018). Challenges faced by novice teachers: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 341-371.
  • Kozikoğlu, İ. & Soyalp, H. (2018). Investigation of beginning teachers', mentor teachers' and school administrators' opinions about teacher induction program. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 33(4), 934-952. http://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2018037027
  • König, J., Blömeke, S. & Kaiser, G. (2015). Early career mathematics teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge and skills: do teacher education, teaching experience, and working conditions make a difference?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9618-5
  • Köse, A. (2016). Assessment of the candidate teachers training process according to the opinions of school administrators. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(3), 924-944.
  • Krüger, J. (2014). Perspektiven pädagogischer professionalisierung: Lehrerbildner/-innen im vorbereitungsdienst für das lehramt an beruflichen schulen [Perspectives of pedagogical professionalisation: teacher trainers in the preparatory service for teaching at vocational schools]. Springer.
  • Kuhlee, D., van Buer, J. & Winch, C. (Eds.). (2015). Governance in der lehrerausbildung: Analysen aus England und Deutschland / governance in initial teacher education: Perspectives on England and Germany [Governance in Teacher Education: Analyzes from England and Germany / Governance in Initial Teacher Education: Perspectives on England and Germany.]. Springer.
  • Kutlu, D. (2018). Examination of the pedagogical content knowledge levels of novice secondary school mathematics teachers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.
  • Landesprüfungsamt. (2011). Staatsprüfung für Lehrämter an Schulen. Ordnung des Vorbereitungsdienstes und der Staatsprüfung für Lehrämter an Schulen (OVP) from https://www.schulministerium.nrw.de/docs/Recht/LAusbildung/Vorbereitungsdienst/O VP.pdf
  • Langdon, F. (2011). Shifting perception and practice: New Zealand beginning teacher induction and mentoring as a pathway to expertise. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.509658
  • Langdon, F. J., Alexander, P. A., Ryde, A. & Baggetta, P. (2014). A national survey of induction and mentoring: How it is perceived within communities of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.004
  • Lee, J. C. & Feng, S. (2007). Mentoring support and the professional development of beginning teachers: a Chinese perspective. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260701201760
  • Li, Y., & Huang, R. (2013). How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching. Routledge.
  • Li, J. & Li, Y. (2013). The teaching contest as a professional development activity to promote classroom instruction excellence in China. In Y. Li and R. Huang (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching (pp.204-220). Routledge.
  • Liang, S., Glaz, S., DeFranco, T., Vinsonhaler, C., Grenier, R. & Cardetti, F. (2013). An examination of the preparation and practice of grades 7–12 mathematics teachers from the Shandong Province in China. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9228-x
  • Lind, P. (2007). Preface. In M. Cameron (Ed.), Learning to teach: A literature review of induction theory and practice (p. i-ii). New Zealand Teachers Council.
  • Long, J. S., McKenzie-Robblee, S., Schaefer, L., Steeves, P., Wnuk, S., Pinnegar, E., & Clandinin, D. J. (2012). Literature review on induction and mentoring related to early career teacher attrition and retention. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645598
  • Lovett, S. & Davey, R. (2009). Being a secondary English teacher in New Zealand: Complex realities in the first 18 months. Professional Development in Education, 35(4), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250902879600
  • Ma, L. (1992). Discussing teacher induction in China and relevant debates in the United States with a Chinese teacher: A conversation with Yu Yi (research report No: Craft Paper 92-2). The National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Erlbaum.
  • Mansell, R. (1996). Professional development of beginning teachers. How does it work? [Paper presentation]. New Zealand Association for Research in Education conference, Nelson, New Zealand.
  • McBride, C. P. (2012). Components of effective teacher induction programs and the impact of experienced mentors [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Arkansas USA.
  • Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K. & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers' professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010
  • Miao, J. (2009). Beginning teacher induction at three elementary schools in China: A case study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Seton Hall University, USA.
  • Ministry of Education [MoE] (2019). Statistical report on China’s vocational education in 2018. Retrieved July, 15, 2019 from http://en.moe.gov.cn/documents/reports/201906/t20190605_384566.html
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (1995). Milli eğitim bakanlığı aday memurların yetiştirilmelerine ilişkin yönetmelik [Ministry of National Education regulation on the training of candidate civil servants]. Retrieved July, 15, 2019 from https://kms.kaysis.gov.tr/Home/Goster/45068?
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2016a). Aday öğretmen yetiştirme sürecine ilişkin yönerge [Instruction on the induction process]. Journal of Notifications, 2456947.
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2016b). Aday öğretmen yetiştirme programı [Induction program]. Retrieved July, 15, 2019 from https://kirikkale.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_10/18125853_aday_ogretmen_yetistirme_programi
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Adaylık kaldırma sınavı (AKS) e-kılavuzu [E-guide for Candidate Removal Exam]. Retrieved July, 15, 2019 from http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_11/06104059_9_ARALIK_2018_AKS_E-KILAVUZU.pdf
  • Moir, E. (2009). Accelerating teacher effectiveness: Lessons learned from two decades of new teacher induction. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100204
  • Moore, W. (2014). Experiences of first-time mentor teachers in New Zealand primary schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland.
  • Naillioğlu-Kaymak, M., & Sezgin, F. (2021). Advisor mentoring roles: Opinions of candidate and advisor teachers in the candidate teacher training process. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Education, 41(1), 307-345.
  • Nayır, F. & Çetin, S. K. (2017). Opinions of teacher candidates on mentor teacher program (example of Muğla). Journal of Education and Future, 12, 137-155.
  • New Zealand Education Council. (2015). Graduating teacher standards: Aotearoa New Zealand. Ministry of Education.
  • New Zealand Education Council. (2018). Moving on with code of professional responsibility and standards for the teaching profession. Workshop resource book 2017-2018. New Zealand Education Council.
  • New Zealand Teachers Council. (2011). Guidelines for induction and mentoring and mentor teachers. New Zealand Education Council.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2004). Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Country Report.
  • Özan, M. B. & Nanto, Z. (2018). Views of school principals about the candidate teachers training process. Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 187-202.
  • Özen, H., Kiliçoğlu, G., & Kiliçoğlu, D. Y. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ views on pre-service teacher training program: a qualitative research. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 49(49), 99-120.
  • Özonay, İ. Z. (2004). Evaluation of teachers' induction training program [Paper presentation]. 13th Annunal National Educational Sciences Congress, İnönü University.
  • Paine, L. W. (1990). The teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819009200105
  • Paine, L. W., Pimm, D., Britton, E., Raizen, S. & Wilson S. (2003a). Rethinking induction: Examples from around the world. In M. Scherer (Ed.), Keeping good teachers (pp. 67–80). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Paine, L. W., Fang, Y. & Wilson, S. (2003b). Entering a culture of teaching: Teacher induction in Shanghai. In E. Britton, L. W. Paine, D. Pimm, and S. Raizen (Eds.), Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning (pp. 20–82). Kluwer Academic Publishing.
  • Paine, L. W. & Schwille, J. R. (2010). Teacher induction in international contexts. In J. Wang, S. J. Odell, & R. T. Clift (Eds.), Past, present and future research on teacher induction: An anthology for researcher, policy makers and practitioners (pp. 31–44). Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Piggot-Irvine, E., Aitken, H., Ritchie, J., Ferguson, P. B. & McGrath, F. (2009). Induction of newly qualified teachers in New Zealand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660902804030
  • Polat, Ş., & Bakan, S. (2018). Counselor teacher opinions on the candidate teacher training process [Paper presentation]. Turkey Graduate Studies Congress, Burdur.
  • Preus, B. (2007). Educational trends in China and the United States: proverbial pendulum or potential for balance?. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900207
  • Renwick, M. (2001). Support for beginning teachers. Ministry of Education.
  • Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O. & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008
  • Richter, D., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Klusmann, U., Anders, Y. & Baumert, J. (2013). How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers' development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.012
  • Robinson, G. W. (1998, October). New teacher induction: A study of selected new teacher induction models and common practices [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Salleh, H. & Tan, C. (2013). Novice teachers learning from others: Mentoring in Shanghai schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 10.
  • Sarı, M. H. & Altun, Y. (2015). Problems faced by beginning primary education teachers. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 30(1), 213-226.
  • Scherer, M. (1999). A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Schleppenbach, M., Flevares, L., Sims, L. & Perry, M. (2007). Teachers’ responses to student mistakes in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1086/525551
  • Schwille, J., Dembélé, M. & Schubert, J. G. (2007). Global perspectives on teacher learning: Improving policy and practice. UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
  • Solak, İ. (1999). Aday öğretmenlerin yetiştirilmelerine ilişkin yönetmelikte öngörülen uygulamalı eğitimin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the applied training stipulated in the regulation on the training of novice teachers] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İnönü University, Malatya.
  • Stephens, M., and J. Moskowitz. (1997). Teacher induction policy and practice among APEC members: Results of the exploratory survey. In J. Moskowitz and M. Stephens (Eds.), From students of teaching to teachers of students: Teacher induction around the Pacific Rim (pp. 169–183). Department of Education.
  • Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Springer.
  • Tavukçuoğlu, E. (2021). Opinions of prospective teachers on out-of-school activities and in-service trainings within the prospective candidate teacher training course. World Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1-2), 75-86.
  • Terhart, E. (2007). Teacher induction in Germany: traditions and perspectives. In M. V. Zuljan and J. Vogrinc (Eds.), Professional inductions of teachers in Europe and elsewhere (pp. 154-166). University of Ljubljana.
  • Topsakal, C. & Duysak, A. (2017). Opinions of candidate teachers and other stakeholders related to the candidate teacher training process. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(3), 625-638.
  • Tunçbilek, M. M. & Tünay, T. (2017). Percieve of relevant parties to canditate teacher training process of ministry of national education in Turkey. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(61), 412-427.
  • Ulubey, Ö. (2018). Evaluation of novice teacher training program. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 33(2), 480-502.
  • Wang, C. (2018). Analysing teachers’expertise, resources and collective work throughout Chinese and french windows. Ensino da Matemática em Debate, 5(3), 367-382.
  • Wang, J. (2001). Contexts of mentoring and opportunities for learning to teach: A comparative study of mentoring practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00038-X
  • Wang, J. & Paine, L. (2001). Mentoring as assisted performance: A Pair of Chinese teachers working together. The Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 157 – 181. https://doi.org/10.1086/499698
  • Wang, J., Strong, M. & Odell, S. J. (2004) Mentor-novice conversations about teaching: a comparison of two U.S. and two Chinese cases. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 775–813.
  • Wehrhöfer, U. (2013). Lehrerausbildungsreform in Nordrhein-Westfalen gut gestartet! Zwischenbilanz und Perspektive [Teacher training reform in North Rhine-Westphalia started well! Interim result and perspective]. Schule NRW, 11, 6–9.
  • Weiss, E. M. & Weiss, S. G. (1999). Beginning teacher induction. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
  • Wong, H. K. (2002). Induction: The best form of professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 52-55.
  • Wong, H. K. (2005). New teacher induction: The foundation for comprehensive, coherent, and sustained professional development. Corwin Press.
  • Wong, H. K., Britton, T. & Ganser, T. (2005). What the world can teach us about new teacher induction. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600509
  • Wood, A. L. & Stanulis, R. N. (2009). Quality teacher induction:“Fourth-wave”(1997– 2006) induction programs. The New Educator, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399561
  • World Bank. (2009). Induction programs for newly trained teachers. Author.
  • Yanık, H. B., Bağdat, O., Gelici, Ö. & Taştepe, M. (2016). The challenges facing beginning middle school mathematics teachers. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 13(36), 130-152.
  • Yang, Y. (2009). How a Chinese teacher improved classroom teaching in teaching research group: A case study on Pythagoras theorem teaching in Shanghai. ZDM, 41(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0171-y
  • Yetkiner, A. & Bıkmaz, F. (2019). Novice teachers’ views on induction practices in Turkey. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 9(1), 73-104. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2019.005
  • Yıldırım, M. (1997). Aday öğretmenleri yetiştirme programının uygulanmasında karşılaşılan sorunlar [Problems encountered in the implementation of the candidate teacher training program] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İnönü University, Malatya.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2017). Problems encountered during candidate teacher training and suggested solutions. Education and Society in the 21st Century: Journal of Educational Sciences and Social Research, 6(16), 135-155.
  • Zhang, M., Ding, X., & Xu, J. (2016). Developing Shanghai's teachers: Teacher quality systems in top performing countries. National Center on Education and the Economy.
  • Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T. & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(4), 438-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.02.001

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.