Abstract

This study investigates the direct effects of theoretical teaching methods, practical teaching methods and school-enterprise cooperations on engineering innovation ability among higher vocational education students in Henan, China. Using the Triple Helix Model as a framework, the research examines the dynamic collaboration between academia, industry and government in fostering innovation ecosystems within engineering education. Data from 409 students across 13 vocational institutions were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling via AMOS. The findings from hypothesis testing provide clear insights with theoretical teaching methods having a weak and statistically insignificant effect on engineering innovation ability, highlighting the need for more practical integration, practical teaching methodologies show a significant positive effect on engineering innovation ability and reinforcing the value of hands-on, application-based learning in fostering innovation. Moreover, school-enterprise cooperation demonstrates the strongest positive effect on engineering innovation ability, reinforcing the critical role of real-world industry partnerships in enhancing students’ innovative capabilities. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, educators and industry stakeholders in Henan, suggesting a focus on practical, collaborative approaches to better prepare graduates to meet the dynamic demands of the technological landscape.

Keywords

References

• Albayrak-Serin, D., & Yalçıner, A. Y. (2021). A survey to examine engineers’ perspectives on innovation and industry 4.0. Proceedings, 74(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021074016
• Cai, Y., & Amaral, M. (2021). The triple helix model and the future of innovation: A Reflection on the Triple Helix Research Agenda. Triple Helix, 8(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-12340004
• Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present and future. Triple Helix, 7(2-3), 189-226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003
• Chang, Y. C. (2018). Analyzing the moderating effect of knowledge innovation of tourism and hospitality department teachers on student creative self-efficacy and innovation behaviors by using hierarchical linear modeling. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1535755. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1535755
• Chanthes, S. (2022). University outreach in the triple helix model of collaboration for entrepreneurial development. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i2.20086
• Charosky, G., Hassi, L., Papageorgiou, K., & Bragós, R. (2022). Developing innovation competences in engineering students: a comparison of two approaches. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1968347
• Chen, R., Zheng, Y., Xu, X., Zhao, H., Ren, J., & Tan, H. Z. (2020). STEM teaching for the Internet of Things maker course: A teaching model based on the iterative loop. Sustainability, 12(14), 5758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145758
• Cheng, G., Zhang, C. X., Fan, Y. C., Li, F. F., Lin, L., & Zhu, X. B. (2019). Practicing education of the mineral processing engineering discipline in Henan Polytechnic University. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1573642
• Costa, J., Neves, A. R., & Reis, J. (2021). Two sides of the same coin. university-industry cooperation and open innovation as enhancers of firm performance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073866
• Daaif, J., Zerraf, S., Tridane, M., Benmokhtar, S., & Belaaouad, S. (2019). Pedagogical engineering to the teaching of the practical experiments of chemistry: Development of an application of three-dimensional digital modelling of crystalline structures. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1708651. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1708651
• Department of Education of the Henan Province. (2023). List of higher vocational institutions in Henan. Author. http://m.jyt.henan.gov.cn
• Diez-Pascual, A. M., Capilla, R. P., & Díaz, P. G. (2018). Design of simulation tools for teaching in photovoltaic energy engineering. Proceedings, 2(21), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021074016
• Dudin, M., Frolova, E., Gryzunova, N., & Shuvalova, E. (2015). The triple helix model as a mechanism for partnership between the state, business and the scientific-educational community in the area of organizing national innovation development. Asian Social Science, 1(1), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n1p230
• Faria, J., Mixon, F., & Upadhyaya, K. (2019). Public policy and the university-industry R&D nexus. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 499-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1561165
• Feola, R., Vesci, M., Botti, A., & Parente, R. (2019). The determinants of entrepreneurial intention of young researchers: Combining the theory of planned behavior with the triple Helix model. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1424-1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12361
• Frick, T., Chadha, R., Wang, Y., Watson, C., & Green, P. (2007). Theory-based course evaluation: Nine scales for measuring teaching and learning quality [Unpublished manuscript]. School of Education, Indiana University. https://tedfrick.sitehost.iu.edu/TALQs.pdf
• Gadasina, L., Voitenko, S., & Vyunenko, L. (2022). The principles of forming a data-driven university model within the cluster-network model of innovative development. In E. Zaramenskikh & A. Fedorova (Eds.), Digitalization of society, economics and management: a digital strategy based on post-pandemic developments (pp. 235-245). Springer.
• Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103
• Hailu, A. T. (2024). The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: implementation of triple helix model relations. Journal of Innovation and entrepreneurship, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00370-y
• Henan Provincial Development and Reform Commission. (2021). Annual economic report: Henan province. Author.
• Henkel, M., Zwick, M., Beuker, J., Willenbacher, J., Baumann, S., Oswald, F., Neumann, A., Siemann-Herzberg, M., Syldatk, C. & Hausmann, R. (2015). Teaching bioprocess engineering to undergraduates: Multidisciplinary hands‐on training in a one‐week practical course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 43(3), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20860
• Huang, L., Zhang, W., Jiang, H., & Wang, J. L. (2021). The teaching quality evaluation of Chinese-Foreign cooperation in running schools from the perspective of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(3), 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031975
• Huang, Y., Zhang, J., Sang, X., & Ou, H. (2022). Insight into practical teaching in rural planning in colleges based on the “Rural Innovation Workshop”. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09561-0
• Kim, L., & Jang, D. H. (2021). Culturing atmosphere for spontaneous innovation: academic action and triple-helix dynamics in South Korea. Higher Education Policy, 34, 429-455. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00143-3
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279-286.
• Li, N., Jiang, P., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2022). College teaching innovation from the perspective of sustainable development: the construction and twelve-year practice of the 2p3e4r system. Sustainability, 14(12), 7130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127130
• Mandrup, M., & Jensen, T. L. (2017). Educational Action Research and Triple Helix principles in entrepreneurship education: introducing the EARTH design to explore individuals in Triple Helix collaboration. Triple Helix, 4(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-017-0048-y
• Mandumpal, J. B., Ferdinand-James, D. S., Ziarati, P., Hussein, E. K., Umachandran, K., & Kennedy, I. G. (2022). Innovation-based learning (InnBL): Turning science and engineering undergraduate degree programmes towards innovation. Journal of Creativity, 32(1), 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100013
• Mayhew, M. J., Selznick, B., Zhang, L., Barnes, A., & Mangia, S. (2021). Teaching innovation capacities in undergraduate leadership courses: the influence of a short-term pedagogical intervention. Journal of Higher Education, 92(6), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1876480
• Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020). Educational statistics yearbook of China. China Statistics Press.
• Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Mena-Guacas, A. F., & Reyes-Rebollo, M. M. (2023). Impact of gamified teaching on university student learning. Education Sciences, 13(5), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050470
• Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.
• Revilla-Cuesta, V., Skaf, M., Manso, J. M., & Ortega-Lopez, V. (2020). Student perceptions of formative assessment and cooperative work on a technical engineering course. Sustainability, 12(11), 4569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114569
• Rodrigues, F. C. R., & Gava, R. (2016). Capacidade de apoio à inovação dos Institutos Federais e das Universidades Federais no estado de Minas Gerais: Um estudo comparativo. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 22, 26-51. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.0282015.5445
• Shan, X., Cao, J., & Xie, T. (2023). The development and teaching of the postgraduate course “engineering system modeling and simulation” in combination with essentials taken from research projects. Systems, 11(5), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11050225
• Shi, L., Lu, S., Cao, P., & Zhang, L. (2021). Practice and thinking of constructing school‐enterprise cooperation and innovative talent training system for new engineering. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 4(8), 35-41.
• Song, Q. (2024). Research on the integration path of industry and education in the new business science in the digital intelligence era. Advances in Vocational and Technical Education, 6(4), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.23977/avte.2024.060415
• Sunderland, M. E., Taebi, B., Carson, C., & Kastenberg, W. (2014). Teaching global perspectives: Engineering ethics across international and academic borders. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922337
• Towns, E., & Ashby, S. (2014). The influence of practice educators on occupational therapy students’ understanding of the practical applications of theoretical knowledge: A phenomenological study into student experiences of practice education. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61(5), 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12134
• Walker, J. P., & Rocconi, L. M. (2021). Experiential learning student surveys: indirect measures of student growth. Research & Practice in Assessment, 16(1), 21-35.
• Wu, H., Zhang, X., & Xie, L. (2022). Development of “introduction education and training” for the innovation of “double qualified” teacher talent training mechanism [J]. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 4(12), 22. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2022.041220
• Wu, M., & Siswanto, I. (2020). Cooperation between universities, government and industries: applying the triple helix relationship model to Indonesian education improvement. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 34(6), 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2020.110002
• Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis. Harper and Row.
• Yan, Y. (2022). Decision tree algorithm in the performance evaluation of school-enterprise cooperation for higher vocational education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 151168. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4151168
• Yang, Y. T. C. (2015). Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students. Computers & Education, 81, 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.004
• Yang, T., Wang, T., & Gu, G. (2019). Research on the impacts of foreign direct investment to the service industry: cointegration analysis and grainger causality test based on data of Henan Province during 1996~ 2014. In H. Watanabe & D. H. Kim (Eds.), 9th International Conference on Information and Social Science (pp. 549-556). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.25236/iciss.2019.099
• Yao, Y., Zhao, W., & Zhang, S. (2023). Effects of government innovation support on the innovation ability of universities: Evidence from the quasi-natural experiment of China’s innovation and entrepreneurship pilot demonstration policy. Sustainability, 15(1), 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010791
• Zhang, T., Huang, H., & Chen, F. (2021, October). Exploration and practice of an innovative idea and method of organized engineering education. In J. Hudgins & L. Soh (Eds.), 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637378
• Zuo, D. D. (2014). The study on the engineering innovation based on double triple helix model. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 687, 4967-4971. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.687-691.4967

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.