The influence of augmented reality on creativity, student behavior, and pedagogical strategies in technology-infused education management
LiJuan Huang 1 * , Adiza Alhassan Musah 1
More Detail
1 Management & Science University, Malaysia
* Corresponding Author


In the ever-changing sector of education, the use of technology has become critical to innovation and increased learning opportunities. This research illustrates the intricate connections that exist between augmented reality [AR] and tremendous educational attributes, thinking about how AR might modify conventional teaching approaches. The important motive is to offer an entire knowledge of how augmented fact influences crucial areas of the educational revel in. Utilizing a quantitative studies method, the study seems at how AR impacts pupil behavior, creativity, and instructional practices, in addition to the mediating and moderating elements that influence these relationships. An online questionnaire was used to collect data from 444 random samples. The relationships between AR, teacher competence, technology acceptance, and educational outcomes were examined. Data shows that augmented reality has a positive effect on creativity, student behavior, and teaching strategies. Teacher competence moderated these relationships, highlighting the critical role of teachers in successfully integrating augmented reality, while technology acceptance emerged as a significant mediator demonstrating the significance of user perceptions. This study has critical implications for educators, administrators, and policymakers interested in using AR to improve instructional development, as well as for the field of generation-infused schooling administration. Additionally, it advances theoretical frameworks through a better understanding of the complicated tactics that impact the uptake and acceptability of AR.



  • Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The impact of social media on learning behavior for sustainable education: Evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(6), 1683.
  • AlFadalat, M., & Al-Azhari, W. (2022). An integrating contextual approach using architectural procedural modeling and augmented reality in residential buildings: the case of Amman city. Heliyon, 8(8), e10040.
  • AlMarwani, M. (2020). Pedagogical potential of SWOT analysis: An approach to teaching critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100741.
  • Alyoussef, I. Y. (2022). Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Heliyon, 8(12), e12529.
  • Andrews, J. E., Ward, H., & Yoon, J. (2021). UTAUT as a model for understanding intention to adopt ai and related technologies among librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), 102437.
  • Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266.
  • Arulanand, N., Babu, A. R., & Rajesh, P. K. (2020). Enriched Learning Experience using Augmented Reality Framework in Engineering Education. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 937–942.
  • Benvenuti, M., Cangelosi, A., Weinberger, A., Mazzoni, E., Benassi, M., Barbaresi, M., & Orsoni, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and human behavioral development: A perspective on new skills and competences acquisition for the educational context. Computers in Human Behavior, 107903.
  • Buchner, J., & Kerres, M. (2023). Media comparison studies dominate comparative research on augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 195, 104711.
  • Bursali, H., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019a). Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students’ reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 126–135.
  • Bursali, H., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019b). Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students’ reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 126–135.
  • Cabero-Almenara, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2019). Adoption of augmented reality technology by university students. Heliyon, 5(5), e01597.
  • Campo, A., Michałko, A., Van Kerrebroeck, B., Stajic, B., Pokric, M., & Leman, M. (2023). The assessment of presence and performance in an AR environment for motor imitation learning: A case-study on violinists. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107810.
  • Catala, A., Gijlers, H., & Visser, I. (2022). Guidance in storytelling tables supports emotional development in kindergartners. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 12907–12937.
  • Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, 104358.
  • Dai, L., Jung, M. M., Postma, M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2022). A systematic review of pedagogical agent research: Similarities, differences and unexplored aspects. Computers & Education, 190, 104607.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339.
  • de Giorgio, A., Monetti, F. M., Maffei, A., Romero, M., & Wang, L. (2023). Adopting extended reality? A systematic review of manufacturing training and teaching applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 645–663.
  • Eswaran, M., & Raju Bahubalendruni, M. V. A. (2023). Augmented reality aided object mapping for worker assistance/training in an industrial assembly context: Exploration of affordance with existing guidance techniques. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 185, 109663.
  • Faqih, K. M. S. (2022). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt a technological innovation from a developing country context: The case of mobile augmented reality games. Technology in Society, 69, 101958.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39.
  • Garzón, J., Kinshuk, Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100334.
  • Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2018). Relations between student motivation, immersion and learning outcomes in location-based augmented reality settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 173–181.
  • Goo, M., Myers, D., Maurer, A. L., & Serwetz, R. (2020). Effects of using an iPad to teach early literacy skills to elementary students with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 34–48.
  • Grodotzki, J., Müller, B. T., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2023). Enhancing manufacturing education based on controller-free augmented reality learning. Manufacturing Letters, 35, 1246–1254.
  • Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
  • Heller, J., Mahr, D., de Ruyter, K., Schaap, E., Hilken, T., Keeling, D. I., Chylinski, M., Flavián, C., Jung, T., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2023). An interdisciplinary Co-authorship networking perspective on AR and human behavior: Taking stock and moving ahead. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107697.
  • Hu, X., Goh, Y. M., & Lin, A. (2021). Educational impact of an Augmented Reality (AR) application for teaching structural systems to non-engineering students. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 50, 101436.
  • Jadán-Guerrero, J., Sanchez-Gordon, S., Acosta-Vargas, P., Alvites-Huamaní, C. G., & Nunes, I. L. (2020). Interactive storytelling books for fostering inclusion of children with special needs. In N. I.L. (Ed.), AHFE Virtual Conference on Human Factors and Systems Interaction (pp. 222–228). Springer.
  • Kok, D. L., Dushyanthen, S., Peters, G., Sapkaroski, D., Barrett, M., Sim, J., & Eriksen, J. G. (2022). Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education – A review and expert commentary. Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, 24, 25–31.
  • Koutromanos, G., & Kazakou, G. (2023). Augmented reality smart glasses use and acceptance: Α literature review. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100028.
  • Liu, H., Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: a survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765.
  • Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers and Education, 56(4), 1012–1022.
  • López-Faican, L., & Jaen, J. (2023). Design and evaluation of an augmented reality cyberphysical game for the development of empathic abilities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 176, 103041.
  • Malaquias, R. F., & Malaquias, F. F. D. O. (2021). A literature review on the benefits of serious games to the literacy process of children with disabilities and learning difficulties. Technology and Disability, 33(4), 273–282.
  • Matsika, C., & Zhou, M. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption and use of AVR technology in higher and tertiary education. Technology in Society, 67, 101694.
  • McLean, G., & Wilson, A. (2019). Shopping in the digital world: Examining customer engagement through augmented reality mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 210–224.
  • Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K., Helsinghof, H., & Brænder, B. (2020). Digital expansions of physical learning spaces in practice-based subjects - blended learning in Art and Craft & Design in teacher education. Computers & Education, 159, 104020.
  • O’Connor, Y., & Mahony, C. (2023). Exploring the impact of augmented reality on student academic self-efficacy in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107963.
  • Ponzoa, J. M., Gómez, A., Villaverde, S., & Díaz, V. (2021). Technologically empowered? perception and acceptance of AR glasses and 3D printers in new generations of consumers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121166.
  • Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
  • Qiu, Y., & Luo, W. (2022). Investigation of the effect of flipped listening instruction on the listening performance and listening anxiety of Chinese EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1043004.
  • Radu, I., Huang, X., Kestin, G., & Schneider, B. (2023). How augmented reality influences student learning and inquiry styles: A study of 1-1 physics remote AR tutoring. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100011.
  • Radu, I., & Schneider, B. (2023a). Designing augmented reality for makerspaces: Guidelines, lessons and mitigation strategies from 5+ years of AR educational projects. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100026.
  • Radu, I., & Schneider, B. (2023b). Designing augmented reality for makerspaces: Guidelines, lessons and mitigation strategies from 5+ years of AR educational projects. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100026.
  • Ronaghi, M. H., & Ronaghi, M. (2022). A contextualized study of the usage of the augmented reality technology in the tourism industry. Decision Analytics Journal, 5, 100136.
  • Ronaghi, M., & Ronaghi, M. H. (2021). Investigating the impact of economic, political, and social factors on augmented reality technology acceptance in agriculture (livestock farming) sector in a developing country. Technology in Society, 67, 101739.
  • Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2016.06.007
  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, A. E. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1- 47). Springer.
  • Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35.
  • Silva, M., Bermúdez, K., & Caro, K. (2023). Effect of an augmented reality app on academic achievement, motivation, and technology acceptance of university students of a chemistry course. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100022.
  • Silviyanti, T. M., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). EFL teachers’ perceptions on using ICT in their teaching: To use or to reject? Teaching English with Technology, 15(4), 29–43.
  • Sorko, S. R., Trattner, C., & Komar, J. (2020). Implementing AR/MR – Learning factories as protected learning space to rise the acceptance for Mixed and Augmented Reality devices in production. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 367–372.
  • Stammler, B., Flammer, K., Schuster, T., Lambert, M., Neumann, O., Lux, M., Matuz, T., & Karnath, H.-O. (2023). Spatial neglect therapy with the augmented reality app “negami” for active exploration training: a randomized controlled trial on 20 stroke patients with spatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 104(12), 1987–1994.
  • Tatarinova, M. N., Shvetsova, M. G., Vladimirova, E. N., Gruba, N. A., & Heberlein, F. A. (2022). Emotional value technology of foreign-language education for the development of speech communication abilities. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 58(4), 281–306.
  • Teo, T., Khazaie, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2022). Exploring teacher immediacy-(non)dependency in the tutored augmented reality game-assisted flipped classrooms of English for medical purposes comprehension among the Asian students. Computers & Education, 179, 104406.
  • Tzima, S., Styliaras, G., Bassounas, A., & Tzima, M. (2020). Harnessing the potential of storytelling and mobile technology in intangible cultural heritage: A case study in early childhood education in sustainability. Sustainability, 12(22), 1–22.
  • Vocke, C., Constantinescu, C., & Popescu, D. (2019). Application potentials of artificial intelligence for the design of innovation processes. Procedia CIRP, 84, 810–813.
  • Yang, X.-Y., & Yang, C. (2022). Information Technology and Its Use in Medical Vocational Education: Present Practice and Future Prospects. In S. Shi., R. Ma, & W. Lu (Eds.), 4th EAI International Conference on 6G for Future Wireless Networks, 6GN 2021, Vol. 439 LNICST (pp. 649–656). Springer.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.