The effect of formative assessment on high school students' mathematics achievement and attitudes
Yusuf Ziya Kültür 1 * , Mahmut Oğuz Kutlu 2
More Detail
1 Ministry of National Education, Turkey
2 Çukurova University, Faculty of Education, Turkey
* Corresponding Author


The purpose of this research is to examine the effects of formative assessment practices on students’ academic achievement, attitudes towards mathematics, and to investigate their views on formative assessment practices. A 12-week quasi-experimental research design was adopted in the research. The research group consisted of 51 students in the 10th grade (26 in the experimental group and 25 in the control group) of a high school. Qualitative data were obtained via functions academic test and mathematics attitude scale while a semi-structured interview form was used as a qualitative data collection tool. The quantitative results revealed that the effect of formative assessment practices on students' attitudes towards mathematics and mathematics achievement was statistically significant. According to the qualitative results of the research, formative assessment practices were found to be beneficial in terms of contributing to learning processes and encouraging students to express themselves in the classroom. It is recommended that teachers use formative assessment to support student-centered classrooms in teaching mathematics and to effectively evaluate students' mathematical competence in the learning process.



  • Altıparmak, K., Aklar, M. A., & Dursun, G. (2017). If I were a math teacher for one day, what would I do/wouldn't do: Student opinions. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 1117-1140.
  • Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning and Instruction, 49, 92–102.
  • Ardington, A., & Drury, H. (2017). Design studio discourse in architecture in Australia: The role of formative feedback in assessment. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(2), 157–170.
  • Baird, J. A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350.
  • Barber, B. K., & Schluterman, J. M. (2008). Connectedness in the lives of children and adolescents: A call for greater conceptual clarity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(3), 209–216.
  • Beesley, A. D., Clark, T. F., Dempsey, K., & Tweed, A. (2018). Enhancing formative assessment practice and encouraging middle school mathematics engagement and persistence. School Science and Mathematics, 118(1–2), 4–16.
  • Bower, J., van Kraayenoord, C., & Carroll, A. (2015). Building social connectedness in schools: Australian teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 101–109.
  • Box, C., (2019). Formative assessment in United States classrooms changing the landscape of teaching and learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (26th ed.). Pegem.
  • Casey, S. (2005). Formative assessment: the effect on academic achievement and attitudes toward science. Theses and Dissertations, 974. Rowan University.
  • Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(1), 1–6.
  • Chauncey, P. D. (2009). Perceptions and attitudes of formative assessments in middle-school science classes (Order No. 3379801). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305078889).
  • Chen, I. H., Gamble, J. H., Lee, Z. H., & Fu, Q. L. (2020). Formative assessment with interactive whiteboards: A one-year longitudinal study of primary students’ mathematical performance. Computers & Education, 150, 103833.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cormier, K. (2020). The use of ongoing formative standards-based assessments to improve student learning in an eighth grade mathematics classroom (Order No. 27956608). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2412152148).
  • Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2015). Leveraging disciplinary practices to support students’ active participation in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 247–264.
  • Cramp, A. (2011). Developing first-year engagement with written feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 113–124.
  • Crossouard, B. (2011). Using formative assessment to support complex learning in conditions of social adversity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 59-72.
  • Eddy, C. M., Harrell, P., & Heitz, L. (2017). An observation protocol of short-cycle formative assessment in the mathematics classroom. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(3), 130–147.
  • Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Er, G., & Biber, A. Ç. (2020). Thematic and methodological trends in experimental pattern theses in the field of mathematics education. Trakya Journal of Education, 10(3), 995-1006.
  • Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83–96.
  • Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. ASCD.
  • Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Hattie, J. (2018). Developing “assessment capable” learners. Educational Leadership, 75(5), 46–51.
  • Golden, J. B. (2019). The relationship between formative math assessments and the state summative assessment for middle school students in Alabama (Order No. 27544015). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (2316839127).
  • Gotwals, A. W., Philhower, J., Cisterna, D., & Bennett, S. (2015). Using video to examine formative assessment practices as measures of expertise for mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 405-423.
  • Haroldson, R. A. (2012). Student perceptions of formative assessment in the chemistry classroom (Order No. 3519170). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1034595383).
  • Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible Learning: Feedback. Routledge,
  • Heo, G., & Sihn, H. (2017). The effect of formative evaluation through mutual feedback on mathematics academic achievement and mathematics attitude. Journal of the Korean Mathematical Education Association Series E: Journal of Mathematical Education, 31(4), 409–432.
  • Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.
  • Johnson, A. (2016). The implementation and evaluation of formative feedback on students' attitudes and perceptions on their learning: An action research (Order No. 10006523). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1762590105).
  • Keeley, P. (2015). Science formative assessment: Practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. Corwin Press.
  • Kline, A. J. (2013). Effects of formative assessment on middle school student achievement in mathematics and reading (Order No. 1538121). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (1370241304).
  • Köksalan, S. (2019). Examination of effects of formative assessment in inquiry-based learning on students' conceptual learning and attitudes towards physics [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Marmara University, İstanbul.
  • Loughland, T., & Kilpatrick, L. (2015). Formative assessment in primary science. Education 3-13, 43(2), 128-141.
  • Martin, I. (2010). Handbook of formative assessment – Edited by Heidi L Andrade & Gregory J Cizek. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), E59.
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Ministry of National Education, [MoNE] (2018). Secondary school mathematics (9th, 10th, 11th and 12th grades) curriculum. Author.
  • Moreno, J., & Pineda, A. F. (2020). A framework for automated formative assessment in mathematics courses. IEEE Access, 8, 30152–30159.
  • Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD.
  • Ozan, C., & Kıncal, R. Y. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 85–118.
  • Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2014). The effects of learning activities according to students’ learning styles on students’ academic success and attitude: The sampling of function and derivative conception.Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 5(1), 1-38.
  • Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11, 551–576.
  • Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98.
  • Richards-Babb, M., Curtis, R., Georgieva, Z., & Penn, J. H. (2015). Student perceptions of online homework use for formative assessment of learning in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(11), 1813–1819.
  • Rones, D. D. (2019). Student and teacher response to formative assessment feedback in eighth-grade mathematics: A design experiment (Order No. 13856648). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2248614511).
  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Research in mathematics education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 497–528.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson. CBO9781107415324.004
  • Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M., & Dündar, H. (2014). Trends of research published in the journal of education and science: Content analysis. Education and Science, 39(173). 430-453.
  • Swan M., & Foster C. (2018). Formative assessment lessons. In Thompson, D., Burton M., Cusi A., & Wright D. (Eds.) Classroom assessment in mathematics (pp.11-24). Springer.
  • Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481.
  • Teuscher, D., & Reys, R. (2010). Slope, rate of change, and steepness: Do students understand the concepts? Mathematics Teacher, 103(7), 519–524.
  • Thoms, B. (2011). A dynamic social feedback system to support learning and social interaction in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(4), 340–352. https ://
  • Van den Berg, M., Bosker, R. J., & Suhre, C. J. (2018). Testing the effectiveness of classroom formative assessment in Dutch primary mathematics education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(3), 339-361.
  • Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047.
  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: a meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.
  • Wylie, E. C. (2020). Observing Formative Assessment Practice: Learning Lessons Through Validation. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 251-258.
  • Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39-49.
  • Yalçınkaya, Y., & Özkan, H. H. (2012). Content analysis of articles related to alternative methods of teaching mathematics published in education faculties journals between 2000-2011. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Social Sciences Institute, 2(16), 31-45.
  • Yaşar, M., Çermik, H., & Güner, N. (2014). High school students’ attitudes towards mathematics and factors affect their attitudes in Turkey. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47(2), 41-64.
  • Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500-514. https://10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.