The comfortable educational environment as a contextual condition of students’ school connectedness: How school and family support interact in Kazakhstan’s secondary education
Galiya Sarzhanova 1, Assylbek Nurgabdeshov 2, Maral Omarova 1 * , Erbolat Tulepbayev 3
More Detail
1 Karaganda Buketov University, Kazakhstan
2 Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom
3 SDU University, Kazakhstan
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

School connectedness has become a central priority in contemporary education systems, particularly in reform-oriented contexts where schools are expected to promote students’ psychosocial development alongside academic achievement. Grounded in Bioecological Theory, this study examines how school-based and family support mechanisms relate to students’ school connectedness and how these relationships are conditioned by the comfortable educational environment. Using survey data from 11,524 secondary school students in Kazakhstan, the study applies Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to test direct and moderating relationships among personal development support, psychological and pedagogical support, family engagement in education, the comfortable educational environment, and school connectedness. The results indicate that all three support mechanisms and the comfortable educational environment are positively associated with students’ school connectedness. Moreover, the findings reveal consistent negative moderation effects: as students’ perceptions of environmental comfort increase, the strength of the associations between each support mechanism and school connectedness decreases. Importantly, these interaction effects reflect attenuation rather than substitution, suggesting that the contribution of targeted supports varies across contextual conditions. By demonstrating that relational supports operate differently depending on the broader environmental climate, the study advances a context-sensitive understanding of school connectedness within centralized reform systems. The findings offer practical implications for policymakers and school leaders, highlighting the importance of aligning structured support strategies with the overall psychological quality of educational environments rather than assuming uniformly additive effects.

Keywords

References

  • Adade, J. R. D., Antwi-Danso, S., Amos, P. M., Bedu-Addo, P. K. A., & Antwi, T. (2024). Relationships among counselor trainees‘ emotional intelligence, stress and empathy. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(3), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202426287
  • Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan Bureau of National Statistics. (2024). Dynamics of the main indicators of education coverage. https://bala.stat.gov.kz/en/dinamika-osnovnyh-pokazatelej-ohvata-obrazovaniem/
  • Ambhore, S., & Ofori, E. K. (2023). Exploring psychological well‐being in business and economics arena: A bibliometric analysis. Health Science Reports, 6(1), e1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1044
  • Amholt, T. T., Dammeyer, J., Carter, R., & Niclasen, J. (2020). Psychological well-being and academic achievement among school-aged children: A systematic review. Child Indicators Research, 13(5), 1523-1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09725-9
  • Attri, S. A., Springer, A. E., & Kelder, S. H. (2025). A scoping review of school connectedness interventions for adolescents. Journal of School Health, 95(10), 880-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.70036
  • Bidi, S. B., Bhat, V., Chandra, S. R., Dmello, V. J., Weesie, E., Gil, M. T., Kurian, S., & Rajendran, A. (2024). Decoding occupational well-being of teachers: does psychological capital and coping mechanism impact perceived stress?. Cogent Psychology, 11(1), 2409505. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2024.2409505
  • Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., & Patton, G. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.013
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2000). Ecological systems theory. American Psychological Association.
  • Celia, G., Serio, G., Trotta, E., Tessitore, F., & Cozzolino, M. (2024). Psychological wellbeing of Italian students and clinical assessment tools at university counseling services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1388419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388419
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  • Ecclestone, K. (2012). Emotional well-being in education policy and practice: The need for interdisciplinary perspectives and a sociological imagination. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.690245
  • Fullan, M. (2020). System change in education. American Journal of Education, 126(4), 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1086/709975
  • Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM). Sage.
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hanson, J. M., Trolian, T. L., Paulsen, M. B., & Pascarella, E. T. (2016). Evaluating the influence of peer learning on psychological well-being. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1136278
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Hernández-Torrano, D., Faucher, C., & Tynybayeva, M. (2021). The role of the school psychologist in the promotion of children’s well-being: Evidence from post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Child Indicators Research, 14(3), 1175-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09793-x
  • Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362
  • Holopainen, L., Lappalainen, K., Junttila, N., & Savolainen, H. (2012). The role of social competence in the psychological well-being of adolescents in secondary education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581681
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  • Kúld, P. B., Kef, S., & Sterkenburg, P. S. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of psychological well-being among children with a visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 39(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620915245
  • Kuzhabekova, A., Soltanbekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2018). Educational flagships as brokers in international policy transfer: Learning from the experience of Kazakhstan. European Education, 50(4), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2017.1365306
  • Li, S. (2021). Psychological well-being, mindfulness, and immunity of teachers in second or foreign language education: A theoretical review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 720340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720340
  • Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08284.x
  • Loukas, A., Roalson, L. A., & Herrera, D. E. (2010). School connectedness buffers the effects of negative family relations and poor effortful control on early adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00632.x
  • Makoelle, T. M. (2020). Schools’ transition toward inclusive education in post-Soviet countries: Selected cases in Kazakhstan. Sage Open, 10(2), 2158244020926586. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020926586
  • Moldashev, K., Nurgabdeshov, A., & Kozhakhmet, S. (2025). University–industry collaboration in post-Soviet states: A bibliometric study with implications for educational policy and practice. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 10(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202639742
  • Myrzatayeva, G., Almetov, N., & Tazhmukhanova, N. (2023). Systematic training of future teachers for developing critical thinking of schools pupils in Kazakhstan. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2202103. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2202103
  • Ng, P. T. (2020). The paradoxes of student well-being in Singapore. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120935127
  • Nurgabdeshov, A., & Gassanova, A. (2025). Career self-efficacy of school and university students: a systematic review of ındividual and contextual antecedents (1995–2025). Buketov Business Review, 30(4), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.31489/2025ec4/1204
  • Oladele, B. K., & Komolafe, D. A. (2025). Peer groups, parental factors, and students academic achievement in secondary school economics. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202524951
  • Pak, D. S., Yeltayeva, D. T., & Nurgabdeshov, A. R. (2020). The evaluation of the job-stress in special needs education. Case study of “CLEVER” special needs education center. Achievements of Science and Education, 12, 22-27.
  • Peng, A., & Paterson, M. M. (2025). A review of school connectedness: Definitions, antecedents, and psychological outcomes. Journal of School Health, 95(9), 741-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.70037
  • Piñeiro-Cossio, J., Fernández-Martínez, A., Nuviala, A., & Perez-Ordas, R. (2021). Psychological wellbeing in physical education and school sports: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030864
  • Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., Tabor, J., Beuhring, T., Sieving, R. E., Shew, M., Ireland, M., Bearinger, L. H., & Udry, J. R. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(10), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.10.823
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  • Salavera, C., Urbón, E., Usán, P., Franco, V., Paterna, A., & Aguilar, J. M. (2024). Psychological wellbeing in teachers. Study in teachers of early childhood and primary education. Heliyon, 10(7), e28868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28868
  • Sarzhanova, G., & Nurgabdeshov, A. (2025). Mapping psychological well-being in education: A systematic review of key dimensions and an integrative conceptual framework. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(3), 327-349. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202534832
  • Shochet, I. M., Dadds, M. R., Ham, D., & Montague, R. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1
  • Somerton, M., Stolyarova, V., & Khanin, S. (2022). Autism and the knowledge and beliefs of specialists in Kazakhstan. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(3), 1156-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05021-9
  • Umirzakov, S. Y., Nurgabdeshov, A. R., Zamanbekov, D. S., & Gassanova, A. A. (2019). Human resource managemnt and employee turnover in kazakhstan's companies. Turan University Bulletin, 3, 191-195. https://doi.org/10.47533/2020.1606-146X.13
  • van der Westhuizen, C., Carvajal-Velez, L., de Carvalho Eriksson, C., Gatto, J., Kadirova, A., Samuels, R., Siqabatiso, Z., Skeen, S., Stewart, J., & Lai, J. (2023). Implications for mental health promotion and prevention interventions: Findings from adolescent focus group discussions in Belize, Kazakhstan, and South Africa. Journal of Adolescent Health, 72(1), S105-S111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.024
  • Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
  • Wilkins, N. J., Verlenden, J. M., Szucs, L. E., & Johns, M. M. (2023). Classroom management and facilitation approaches that promote school connectedness. Journal of School Health, 93(7), 582-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13279
  • Wong Aitken, H. G., Rabanal-León, H. C., Saldaña-Bocanegra, J. C., Carranza-Yuncor, N. R., & Rondon-Eusebio, R. F. (2024). Variables linked to academic stress related to the psychological well-being of college students inside and outside the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 14(7), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070739
  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.