Abstract

The importance of case reading and discussion has been steadily increasing in teacher education. This study attempted to investigate what changes, if any, have been brought about by pre-service mathematics teachers’ working on cases on their knowledge of content and students. Nineteen pre-service teachers participated in a 14-week teacher training program and worked on cases related to concepts in the learning area of numbers. The current study employed the mixed method and used the written records constituted by the cases on which the pre-service teachers worked on and the audio recordings of the discussion processes as the data collection tools. In the analysis of the collected data, content analysis was used. The findings revealed that the pre-service teachers’ working on cases contributed to the development of their knowledge of content and students. The pre-service teachers were able to comment more on how students think and where they can have difficulties and understand the reasons behind these difficulties in the later stages of the training. The findings also revealed that the cases the pre-service teachers were engaged in helped them feel like a real teacher. The results showed that case reading and discussion can be one of the important contributors to the development of the pre-service teachers’ knowledge of content and students.

Keywords

References

• Abell, S. K., & Cennamo, K. S. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. In J. Brophy (Eds.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 103– 130). Elsevier Ltd.
• Alkan, R. (2009). Analysis of mistakes and concept regarding the topic of rational numbers in mathematics lesson of the seventh class in the primary education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University, Ankara.
• An, S., &Wu, Z. (2012). Enhancing mathematics teachers' knowledge of students' thinking from accessing and analyzing misconceptions in homework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 717-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9324-x
• Atayev, G. S. (2015). Sixth grade students' achievement levels, errors, and underlying reasons of the errors regarding comprehension and ordering of integers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Ball, D. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003013
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, (pp. 3–14). CMESG/GCEDM.
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes, & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). Jossey Bass.
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
• Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-456). Macmillan.
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Barnett, C., & Tyson, P. (1999). Case methods and teacher change: Shifting authority to build autonomy. In M. Lundeberg, B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 53–69). Erlbaum.
• Bayram, G. (2013). The relationship between 8th grade students’ number sense and achievement related to exponentials [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Pamukkale University, Denizli.
• Bjuland, R., & Mosvold, R. (2015). Lesson study in teacher education: Learning from a challenging case. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.005
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2007). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
• Butler, M. B., Lee, S., & Tippins, D. J. (2006). Case-based methodology as an instructional strategy for understanding diversity: Preservice teachers' perceptions. Multicultural Education, 13(3), 20-26.
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1086/461846
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.5.0385
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026004499
• Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9179-7
• Charalambous, C. Y. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding: An exploratory study. The Elementary School Journal, 770, 247-278. https://doi.org/10.1086/648978
• Crespo, S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers’ interpretations of students’ mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009999016764
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 300-314.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
• Didiş, M.G., Erbaş, A. K., Çetinkaya, B., & Çakıroğlu E. (2014). Prospective secondary mathematics teachers interpretations of students thinking, Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 77-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.849863
• Dinç, Y. (2018). An investigation of eighth grade students’ knowledge construction process of square root numbers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
• Dogruel, A. B. (2019). An examination of elementary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on ratio and proportion [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon.
• Dolk, M., Hertog, J. D., & Gravemeijer, K. (2002). Using multimedia cases for educating the primary school mathematics teacher educator: A design study. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 161–178. 10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00058-7
• Doyle, W. (1980). Classroom management. Kappa Delta Pi.
• Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2010). The teacher education knowledge base: Pedagogical content knowledge. In B. McGraw, P. L. Peterson, E. Baker, (Eds.). International encyclopedia of education (pp. 656-661). Elsevier.
• Erlwanger, S. H. (1973). Benny's conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. The Journal of Children's Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7-26.
• Eroglu, D. (2012). Examining prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ knowledge about students’ mistakes related to fractions [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative growth: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003653
• Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. Cassell Educational Limited Wellington House.
• Gocuk, Ş. (2019). Determination of the concept errors of secondary school eighth grade students about themal numbers and rooted numbers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Fırat University, Elazığ.
• Gravett, S.,Henning, E., & Eiselen, R. (2011). New teachers look back on their university education: Prepared for teaching, but not for life in the classroom. Education as Change, 15(1), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.643636
• Gravett,S; Beer, J., Odendaal-Kroon, R., & Merseth, K. K. (2017) The affordances of case-based teaching for the professional learning of student-teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1149224
• Guedj, D., (2006). Numbers: The universal language. Thames & Hudson.
• Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
• Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 203-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00027-4
• Harrington, H. L. (1999). Case analyses as a performance of thought. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 29–48). Erlbaum.
• Hartman, G. L. (2012). Helping prospective teachers to understand children's mathematical thinking [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University, USA.
• Hashweh, M. Z. (2004). Case-writing as border-crossing: Describing, explaining and promoting teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 229–246.https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000204423
• Heaton, R. M., & Mickelson, W. T. (2002). The learning and teaching of statistical investigationing teaching and teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013886730487
• Heitzmann, R. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: Opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision making. Education, 128, 523–541.
• Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2003). The effects of case libraries on problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 103–114.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00010.x
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. R., Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 97–116). Routledge.
• Jay, J. (2004). Variations on the use of cases in social work and teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000135067
• Kleinfeld, J. (1992). Learning to think like a teacher: The study of cases. In J. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 33-49). Teachers College Press.
• Kunselman, J., & Johnson, K. (2004). Using the case method to facilitate learning. College Teaching, 52, 87–92.https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.52.3.87-92
• Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. Teachers College Press.
• Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
• Leong, K. E. (2012). Good mathematics teaching: Perspectives of beginning secondary teachers, [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Columbia University.
• Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers' thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00013-V
• Lin, P. J. (2002). On enhancing teachers’ knowledge by constructing cases in classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 317–349. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021282918124
• Lin, P. (2005). Using research-based video cases to help pre-service primary teachersconceptualize a comtemporary view of mathematics teaching, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-8369-5
• Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of every- day practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
• Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004
• Lundeberg, M. A., & Scheurman, G. (1997). Looking twice means seeing more: Developing pedagogical knowledge through case analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(8), 783-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00020-6
• Lundeberg, M.A., Levin, B. B., & Harrington, H. L. (1999). Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Erlbaum.
• Masingila, J. & Doerr, H. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers' emerging practices through their analysis of a multimedia case study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 235-263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019847825912
• Mayo, J. A. (2002). Case-based instruction: a technique for increasing conceptual application in introductory psychology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(1), 65–74.https://doi.org/10.1080/107205302753305728
• Mayo, J. A. (2004). Using case-based instruction to bridge the gap between theory and practice in psychology of adjustment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530490273917
• McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
• Merseth, K. K. (1991). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200402
• Merseth, K. K. (1992). Cases for decision making in teacher education. In J. H. Shulman (Eds.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 50–63). Teachers College Press.
• Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (p. 722–743). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
• Merseth, K. K. (1999). Foreword: A rationale for case- based pedagogy in teacher education. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 19-25). Erlbaum.
• Merseth, K. K. (2003). Windows on teaching math: Cases of middle and secondary classrooms. Teachers College Press.
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Elementary and middle school mathematics education program (Grades 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8)]. Author.
• Mostert, M. P. (2007). Challenges of case-based teaching. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(4), 434-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100632
• Moyer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questioning used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 293-315. 10.1023/A:1021251912775
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all students. Author
• Norquist, J. (2008). Implementing the case method: An educational analysis required. Karolinska Institutet.
• Powell, R. (2000). Case-based teaching in homogeneous teacher education contexts: A study of preservice teachers' situative cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00068-2
• Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
• Quek, C. L. G. &Wang, Q. (2010). Supporting beginning teachers' case–based learning in a technology-mediated learning environment. In Steel, C., Keppell, M., Gerbic, P., & Housego, S. (Eds.) ASCILITE 2010 (pp. 1-4). The University of Queensland.
• Reynolds, J. A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature, Review of Educational Research, 62, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062001001
• Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9
• Sato, M., & Rogers, C. (2010). Case methods in teacher education. Elsevier.
• Sertöz, S. (2002). Matematiğin aydınlık dünyası [The bright world of mathematics].Tübitak.
• Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 1–27). Oxford: Elsevier Press.
• Shulman, J. H. (1992). Teacher-written cases with commentaries: A teacher- researcher collaboration. In J. H. Shulman, (Eds.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 131-155). Teacher College Press.
• Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Eds.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1–30). Teachers College Press.
• Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice. Jossey-Bass.
• Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based Professional development for teachers of mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Smith, M. S. &Friel, S. N. (2008). Cases in mathematics teacher education, In M. S. Smith & S. N. Friel (Eds.), Cases in mathematics teacher education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching (p. 1-8). The AMTE Monograph Series.
• Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematics education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Information Age.
• Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 18, 457-521. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X018001457
• Takker, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2012). Understanding teacher's knowledge of and responses to students' mathematical thinking. In Proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education (ICME-12), Topic Study Group 4, (pp. 4906-4915). ICME.
• Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children's conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/749817
• Turnuklu, E. B., & Yeşildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Pre-service primary mathematics teachers' perspectives in Turkey. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1, 1-13.
• Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Pearson.
• Van Es, E. A. & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
• Whitelaw, S., De Beer, J., & Henning, E. (2008). New teachers in a pseudocommunity of practitioners. Education as Change, 12, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823200809487205
• Wilson, S. M., & Ball, D. L. (1996). Helping teachers meet the standards: New challenges for teacher educators. The Elementary School Journal, 97(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1086/461858
• Yapıcı, A. (2013). An investigation of 5, 6 and 7th grade students’ number sense related to percent [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University, Ankara.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.