Abstract

Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy has a significant impact on language learning. It addresses how students organize context-based interactions and how they may employ reading comprehension strategies. Saudi students of English still face reading comprehension issues that significantly affect their overall language learning. Therefore, this mixed method study sought to assess Saudi English students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, determine whether gender and university level affect their use of these strategies, and explore English instructors’ views on this issue. Two instruments were used to achieve these objectives. Two hundred ten students were surveyed for quantitative data. 15 English instructors were interviewed in a semi-structured manner for qualitative data. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to analyze the quantitative data gathered, while pattern matching and thematic content analysis were applied to analyze the qualitative data. The results demonstrated that Saudi EFL students’ metacognitive awareness of reading methods was generally moderate. This awareness was moderate regarding the use of global reading strategies and low regarding support and problem-solving strategies. The metacognitive awareness levels for global strategies vary significantly by gender, in favour of females. Senior and junior university students had better global and support reading methods than freshmen. The qualitative data from the interview supported the quantitative data suggesting Saudi EFL students had low to moderate metacognitive awareness. Their low-to-moderate level explains their poor reading comprehension. Based on these findings, limitations and recommendations are given.

Keywords

References

• Abu-Snoubar, T. (2017). Gender differences in metacognitive reading strategy use among English as a foreign language students at Al-Balqa Applied University. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(18), 1-12.
• Acar-Erdol, T., & Akin-Arikan, Ç. (2022). Gender gap in reading achievement: the mediating role of metacognitive strategies and reading-related attitudes. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2-3), 537-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09692-9
• Algraini, F. (2022).The relationship of metacognitive reading strategies used by Saudi EFL learners and their emotional intelligence. International Journal of English Language and Literature. 11(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v11i1.4440
• Ali, A. M., & Razali, A, B. (2019). A review of studies on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension for ESL/EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p94
• Al-khresheh, M. (2020). The impact of cultural background on listening comprehension of Saudi EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 349- 371. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.22
• Alqahtani, S. M. A. (2019). Investigating the relationship between metacognitive strategies and reading proficiency among the university of Jeddah learners. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, 5(4), 38-52.
• Alrabah, S., & Wu, S. H. (2019).A descriptive analysis of the metacognitive reading strategies employed by EFL college students in Kuwait. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p25
• Alsheikh, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2010).An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic.English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p151
• Amjadiparvar, A. & Zarrin, G. (2019).The relationship between EFL learners’ level of language awareness and their motivation and achievement. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 37-48.
• Aziz, Z. A., Nasir, C., & Ramazani, R. (2019).Applying metacognitive strategies in comprehending English reading texts. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 19(1), 138-159. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v19i1.1863
• Babashamasi, P, Kotamjani, S., & Noordin, N. (2022).The effect of explicit training of metacognitive reading strategies on online reading comprehension. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 8, 246-261 https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.17
• Bagri, G., & Dickinson, L. (2022).The role of metacognitive reading strategies and trait anxiety in critical thinking for a verbal reasoning task. Reading Psychology, 1(20). https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2141391
• Carter, R. (2003). Language awareness. ELT Journal, 51(1), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.1.64
• Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
• Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020).Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
• Divrik, R., Pilten, P., & Tas, A. M. (2020). Effect of inquiry-based learning method supported by metacognitive strategies on fourth-grade students’ problem-solving and problem-posing skills: a mixed methods research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.191
• Do, H. H., & Phan, H. L. T . (2021). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies on second language Vietnamese undergraduates. Arab World English Journal, 12(1) 90-112. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7
• Fairclough, N. (ed.). (1992). Critical language awareness. Routledge.
• Farahian, M., & Rezaee, M. (2015). Language awareness in EFL context: an overview. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 2(2), 19-21.
• Fetters, M., & Freshwater, D. (2015).The 1+1=3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
• Fitrisia, D., Tan, K,. & Qismullah, Y. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students’ performance in reading comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30(1), 15-30.
• Forbes, K., & Fisher, L. (2018).The impact of expanding advanced level secondary school students’ awareness and use of metacognitive learning strategies on confidence and proficiency in foreign language speaking skills. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1010448
• Hughes, A. J. (2019). Measuring metacognitive awareness: applying multiple, triangulated, and mixed-methods approaches for an encompassing measure of metacognitive awareness. Journal of Technology Education, 30(2), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v30i2.a.1
• Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 150-159.
• Kazi, A. S., Moghal, S., & Asad, Z. (2020). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies for academic materials: a study of undergraduate students in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 5(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(v-i).05
• Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching Metacognitive Reading Strategies on reading comprehension of Engineering Students. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069
• Köse, N., & Günes, F. (2021).Undergraduate students’ use of metacognitive strategies while reading and the relationship between strategy use and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n2p99
• Louiza, C., & Fadhila, A. (2022). Metacognitive awareness and perceived use of reading strategies in academic reading comprehension: case of Algerian EFL students. El-Quari ‘e Journal of Literary and Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 750-763.
• Magogwe, J. M. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of University of Botswana English as second language students of different academic reading proficiencies. Reading & Writing, 4(1), a29. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v4i1.29
• Mahasneh, A., Alkhawaldeh, M., & Almakanin, H. (2016). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness reading strategies in Jordan. North American Journal of Psychology, 18, 229-238.
• Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
• Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford.
• Mohseni, F,. Seifoori, Z., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1720946. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1720946
• Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Richard, C. A. (2018). Revising the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
• Mokhtari, K., & Richard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-11.
• Muhid,A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847-862.https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a
• Nanda, D. W., & Azmy, K. (2020). Poor reading comprehension issue in EFL classroom among Indonesian secondary school students: Scrutinizing the causes, impacts and possible solutions. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 8(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v8i1.6771
• Ngoc, N. T. K. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies on Reading English Texts of Non-English Majored Students at Dong Nai Technology University, Vietnam: A Mixed Design. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2022.4.2.12
• Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., & Worwitz, S. (2011). Mixed methods designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health, 38(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z
• Rabadi, R. I., Al-Muhaissen, B., & Al-Bataineh, M. (2020).Metacognitive reading strategies use by English and French foreign language learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 12(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.12.2.7
• Rani, M. S. (2022).Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and usage in reading practices of law students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 4293 – 4302.
• Rao, S. P. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research journal of English. 4(1), 65-79.
• Sariçoban, A., & Behjoo, B, M. (2017).Metacognitive Awareness of Turkish EFL learners on reading strategies. Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 1(21), 159-172.
• Semtin, S., & Maniam, M. (2015).Reading strategies among ESL Malaysian secondary school students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V4I2.4492
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
• Singh, S. (2019). Developing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategy training. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3),264-277.
• Sinom, P, A., Paulus & Kuswandono, P. (2022). Indonesian EFL undergraduate students’ interest towards metacognitive strategy in reading academic comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.728
• Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. The Reading Matrix, 14, 314-323.
• Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
• Wikandari, Y. D. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and understanding performa reading of EFL learners. EDUTEC: Journal of Education and Technology, 4 (2), 289-306.
• Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164
• Zhang, L. (2018). Gender differences in metacognitive and cognitive strategy use and reading test performance. In L. Zhang (Ed.), Metacognitive and cognitive strategy use in reading comprehension (pp. 131-145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6325-1_6

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.