Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education has emerged as a powerful tool for boosting students' mathematics achievement. By integrating these disciplines, students are equipped with essential skills for the 21st-century workforce and can develop a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts. Through hands-on experiments, problem-solving activities, and real-life applications, STEM education offers a dynamic approach to learning mathematics.  This quasi-experimental study aimed to investigate the impact of STEM education on mathematics achievement among 8th-grade students. Although the study lacked the full randomization typically seen in experimental designs, it meticulously designed and validated its measurement tool for assessing mathematics achievement. The pre-and post-tests administered to both the experimental and control groups provided valuable data for evaluating the effectiveness of the STEM education intervention. The statistically significant difference in mathematics achievement between the two groups, with a significance level of ≤ 0.05, strongly suggests that the STEM education program had a positive and meaningful impact on the experimental group's math skills. As a result, the study offers valuable insights into the potential benefits of integrating STEM education into the curriculum for middle school students. Students are encouraged to think critically, collaborate with their peers, and utilize their creativity to solve complex problems. This interdisciplinary approach fosters a deeper engagement with the subject and ignites a passion for learning.  

Keywords

References

• Akyea, T., & Radakovic, N. (2023). Portraits of our practice: Using black Canadian feminist theorizing to reflect on STEM curriculum research and practice. In P. P. Trifonas & S. Jagger (Eds), Handbook of Curriculum Theory and Research (pp. 1-16). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Azennoud, Z. (2022). Technology literacy as a post-COVID-19 survival competence in higher education: A narrative analysis of students’ experiences and prospects. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 3(2), 12968. https://doi.org/10.33902/IJODS.202212968
• Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309-344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
• Brenneman, K., Lange, A., & Nayfeld, I. (2019). Integrating STEM into preschool education; designing a professional development model in diverse settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0912-z
• Cahapay, M. B., & Labrador, M. G. P. (2022). Instructional practices of Filipino teachers in remote mathematics education in COVID-19 times. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 3(1), 101458. https://doi.org/10.33902/IJODS.202211753
• Crabtree, L. M., Richardson, S. C., & Lewis, C. W. (2019). The gifted gap, STEM education, and economic immobility. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 203-231.
• Craig, T. T., & Marshall, J. (2019). Effect of project‐based learning on high school students' state‐mandated, standardized math and science exam performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1461-1488.
• Engin, R. A. (2023). The effect of designing educational digital games on pre-service teachers' some competencies. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(3), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202323576
• Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181
• Fufa, F. S., Tulu, A. H., & Ensene, K. A. (2023). Examining the challenges of using student-centred teaching strategies in secondary schools: A qualitative approach. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(3), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202323181
• Gnagey, J., & Lavertu, S. (2016). The impact of inclusive STEM high schools on student achievement. AERA Open, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416650870
• Gürsoy, K., Bebek, G., & Bülbül, S. (2023). The effect of STEM education practices on academic achievement and scientific process skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(3), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202324071
• Han, S., Capraro, R. & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: the impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
• Hassan Majeed, B., Fouad Jawad, L., & ALRikabi, H. T. S. (2021). The impact of teaching by using STEM approach in the development of creative thinking and mathematical achievement among the students of the fourth scientific class. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(13), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.24185
• Karakaya, F., & Yılmaz, M. (2022). Teachers’ views on assessment and evaluation methods in STEM education: A science course example. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213526
• Kazu, I.Y. & Kurtoglu Yalcin, C., (2021). The effect of STEM education on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(4), 101-116.
• Landolfi, E. (2023). Scientific literacy as part of the science-for-all movement. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 4(1), 20382. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202320382
• León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017
• Macun, Y., & Cemalettin, I. (2022). Effect of problem-based STEM activities on 7th-grade students' mathematics achievements, attitudes, anxiety, self-efficacy and views. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 87-102.
• Mumcu, F., Atman Uslu, N., & Yıldız, B. (2022). Investigating teachers’ expectations from a professional development program for integrated STEM education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213543
• Nağaç, M. & Kalaycı, S. (2021). The effect of STEM activities on students’ academic achievement and problem solving skills: Matter and heat unit. e- Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 8, 480-498. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.964063
• Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Divakar, S. (2021). Determination of sample size and sampling methods in applied research. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 3(1), 25-32.
• Osman, K., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 153-154.
• Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H. H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K‐12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
• Ryan, T. G. (2021). Problem-based learning opportunities within Ontario (Canada) elementary health and physical education. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 3(2), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2021270046
• Santhosh, M., Farooqi, H., Ammar, M., Siby, N., Bhadra, J., Al-Thani, N. J., ... & Ahmad, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis to gauge the effectiveness of STEM informal project-based learning: Investigating the potential moderator variables. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(5), 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10063-y
• Seage, S. J., & Türegün, M. (2020). The effects of blended learning on STEM achievement of elementary school students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 133-140.
• Shahbazloo, F., & Mirzaie, R. A. (2023). Investigating the effect of 5E-based STEM education in solar energy context on creativity and academic achievement of female Junior high School students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101336
• Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology. In E. Abu-Taieh (Ed.), Cyberspace (pp. 1-12). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85731
• Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2020). Integrating survey and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503-516.
• Wang, W., & Li, X. (2023). Spatial navigation test with virtual starmaze: The role of spatial strategy in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10038-z

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.