Medical school students’ misconceptions regarding concept of density
Dimitris Panagou 1 * , Christina E. Kostara 1, Georgios Stylos 1, Konstantinos T. Kotsis 1
More Detail
1 University of Ioannina, Greece
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Throughout the years, scientific research has increasingly aimed to identify students' misconceptions and alternative views regarding fundamental concepts and principles of chemistry. Valuable international bibliographic information was created, including details on teaching density and gaining respondent acceptance. The study aimed to explore alternative ideas about density among Lyceum's honours graduate students attending medical school. Moreover, the gender parameters of the participants were examined. A multiple-choice questionnaire was administered to students to collect data on their gender, age, interest in chemistry, and basic knowledge of chemistry concepts, notably density. Furthermore, we analysed participants' answer accuracy to determine if gender influenced responses or if they were due to statistical fluctuations. In particular, the statistical analysis of the data collected shows that many honours students in the Greek educational system retain a large percentage of the alternative ideas about chemistry concepts. Additionally, the misconceptions recorded in the questions did not correlate with parameters such as grades in the Panhellenic exams, gender, or the student's interest in the chemistry course. Our study's results could improve science teaching by transforming curriculum design and teacher training and enhancing the quality of science instruction in schools.

Keywords

References

  • Abbott, M. L. (2014). Understanding educational statistics using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Abell, S. K. (2013). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell, K. Appleton, & D. Hanuscin, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Routledge.
  • Allen, M. (2019). Misconceptions in Primary Science 3e. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Almuntasheri, S., Gillies, R. M., & Wright, T. (2016). The effectiveness of a guided inquiry-based teachers' professional development programme on Saudi students' understanding of density. Science Education International, 27(1), 16–39.
  • Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
  • Barthlow, M. J., & Watson, S. B. (2014). The effectiveness of process‐oriented guided inquiry learning to reduce alternative conceptions in secondary chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12076
  • Becke, A. D. (2014). Perspective: Fifty years of density-functional theory in chemical physics. The Journal of chemical physics, 140(18), A301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869598
  • Boopathiraj, C., & Chellamani, K. (2013). Analysis of test items on difficulty level and discrimination index in the test for research in education. International journal of social science & interdisciplinary research, 2(2), 189-193.
  • Cohen, A. J., Mori-Sánchez, P., & Yang, W. (2012). Challenges for density functional theory. Chemical reviews, 112(1), 289-320. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200107z
  • Dreizler, R. M., & Gross, E. K. (2012). Density functional theory: an approach to the quantum many-body problem. Springer.
  • Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International journal of science education, 11(5), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501
  • Edsall, J. T., & Wyman, J. (2014). Biophysical chemistry: Thermodynamics, electrostatics, and the biological significance of the properties of matter. Academic Press.
  • Engel, E. (2011). Density functional theory. Springer.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
  • Fisher, K.M., & Moody, D.E. (2002). Student misconceptions in biology. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), Mapping biology knowledge. science & technology education library (pp. 55-75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47225-2_5
  • Flick, U. (2015). Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research project. Sage.
  • Fox, D., & Hackl, M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and philosophy, 29, 537-586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9004-4
  • Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Assessing elementary understanding of electromagnetic radiation and its implementation in wireless technologies among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(2), ep2309. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/13191
  • Gilbert, J. K. & Tregaust, D. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer.
  • Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200804
  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2003). Investigating Greek student’s ideas about forces and motion. Research in Science Education, 33, 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025457116654
  • Kahana, O., & Tal, T. (2014). Understanding of high-achieving science students on the nature of science. International Journal of STEM Education, 1, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0013-5
  • Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. Durham University.
  • Kiray, S. A., & Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and evaluation of the science teacher candidates’ misconceptions about density by using four-tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 935-955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5
  • Kloos, H., Fisher, A., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Situated naïve physics: Task constraints decide what children know about density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020977
  • Koch, W., & Holthausen, M. C. (2015). A chemist's guide to density functional theory. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2022). Using alternative ideas for determining the learning curve on the concept of force. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12251
  • Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2023). Self-concept of Greek primary school teachers and their conceptions of force and weight among their years of service. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(1), 12628. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12628
  • Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2023). The determination of the learning curve on the concept of energy using the alternatives ideas. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(1), 13022. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13022
  • Kotsis, K. T., Stylos, G., Houssou, P. ., & Kamaratos, M. . (2023). Students’ Perceptions of the Heat and Temperature Concepts: A Comparative Study between Primary, Secondary, and University Levels. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.577
  • Labanowski, J. K., & Andzelm, J. W. (Eds.). (2012). Density functional methods in chemistry. Springer.
  • Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927-959. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21022
  • Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
  • Llewellyn, D. (2013). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-and argument-based science standards in grades 3-8. Corwin press.
  • Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: design and analysis. CRC press.
  • Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2019). Students’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism and its implications: A review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i2.5
  • McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
  • Onwu, G. O., & Randall, E. (2006). Some aspects of students’ understanding of a representational model of the particulate nature of matter in chemistry in three different countries. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90012G
  • Panagou D. & Kotsis T. K. (2023, November). Bibliographic review of the perceptions and knowledge of primary school students about the concept of sound [Paper presentation]. 13th Panhellenic Conference on the teaching of natural sciences and new technologies in education, Ioannina, Greece, https://doi.org/10.12681/codiste.5567
  • Panagou, D., & Kotsis, T. K. (2022). Epistimonikós egrammatismós ton Kypríon ekpaideftikón tis defterováthmias ekpaídef̱sis stis énnoies tis Michanikís. [Scientific literacy of Cypriot secondary education teachers in concepts of Mechanics.]. Ioannina, Greece.)
  • Panagou, D., & Kotsis, T. K. (2023). Bibliografikí anaskópisi ton antilípseon kai ton gnóseon mathitón Protováthmias ekpaídefsis gia tin énnoia tou íchou [A literature review of primary school students' perceptions and knowledge of the concept of sound]. Ioannina, Greece. https://doi.org/10.12681/codiste.5567
  • Panagou, D., Kostara, C., Dimos, E., Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. (2024a). Honors high school graduates students’ misconceptions regarding evolutionary theory of biology. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i3.188
  • Panagou, D., Kostara, C., Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024b). Unraveling force and weight misconceptions: a study among medicine enrolled honors high school graduates. European Journal of Physics Education, 15(1), 25-46.
  • Panagou, D., Kotsis, K. T., & Stylos, G. (2022). An empirical study on the evolution of students’ perceptions in basic concepts of physics of primary and secondary education in Cyprus. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(2), 91-109.
  • Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
  • Patten, M. (2016). Questionnaire research: A practical guide. Routledge.
  • Pazza, R., Penteado, P. R., & Kavalco, K. F. (2010). Misconceptions about evolution in Brazilian freshmen students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0187-3
  • Primas, H. (2013). Chemistry, quantum mechanics and reductionism: Perspectives in theoretical chemistry. Springer.
  • Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1301013. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013
  • Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
  • Raub, L. A., Arshad, M. Y., Rosli, M. S., & Shukor, N. A. (2017). Investigating chemical literacy achievement among high-achiever students in Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 8425-8427. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9903
  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1977). Teaching about floating and sinking: an attempt to link cognitive psychology with classroom practice. Science Education, 61(2), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730610215
  • Rowlinson, J. S., & Swinton, F. (2013). Liquids and liquid mixtures: Butterworths monographs in chemistry. Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Salta K. (2017). Chemistry curricula: An analysis of their orientation and structural elements [Paper presentation]. Praktika 10ou Panelliniou Synedriou Didaktikis Fysikon Epistimon kai Nees Technologies stin Ekpaidefsi, Panepistimio Ioanninonb, Ioannina.
  • Sarmah, H. K., & Hazarika, B. B. (2012). Determination of reliability and validity measures of a questionnaire. Indian Journal of Education and information management, 1(11), 508-517.
  • Scott, D. W. (2015). Multivariate density estimation: theory, practice, and visualization. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00111c
  • Sholl, D. S., & Steckel, J. A. (2022). Density functional theory: a practical introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Silverman, B. W. (2018). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Routledge.
  • Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
  • Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221-283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0903_3
  • Snir, J., Smith, C., & Grosslight, L. (1993). Conceptually enhanced simulations: A computer tool for science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694526
  • Suen, H. K. (2012). Principles of test theories. Routledge.
  • Suyatna, A. (2019). Future physics learning materials based on STEM education: Analysis of teachers and students perceptions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012021
  • Talanquer, V. (2006). Commonsense chemistry: A model for understanding students' alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(5), 811. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p811
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  • Thompson, B., Bunch, Z., & Popova, M. (2023). A Review of research on the quality and use of chemistry textbooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2884-2895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00385
  • Tyrrell, H. J. V., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Diffusion in liquids: a theoretical and experimental study. Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Van Driel, J. (2021). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In J. H. van Driel (Ed.), Science teachers’ knowledge development (pp. 1-37). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004505452_001
  • Wagner III, W. E. (2019). Using IBM® SPSS® statistics for research methods and social science statistics. Sage.
  • Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). Indigenous statistics: A quantitative research methodology. Taylor & Francis.
  • Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2012). Student difficulties in learning density: A distributed cognition perspective. Research in Science Education, 42, 769-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9232-7
  • Zucker, R. D., & Biblarz, O. (2019). Fundamentals of gas dynamics. John Wiley & Sons.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.