An investigation of the use of specific problem-solving strategies by mathematics teachers in lessons
Funda Aydın Güç 1 * , Dilay Daltaban 2
More Detail
1 Giresun University, Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics Education, Giresun, Turkey
2 Ministry of National Education, Donandı Tıllik Secondary School, Turkey
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the strategies teachers offer to provide students with experience solving problems in the classroom. A total of 15 secondary school teachers serving in secondary schools were observed through 10 classes each, with no emphasis on the topics covered and grade levels taught. The researcher observing the classes performed a descriptive analysis of the problem-solving processes employed by the teachers through the lens of a series of known problem-solving strategies. The study revealed that the teachers employed a number of strategies as part of the problem-solving process. However, it was observed that the rate of application of strategies was rather low, even though specific strategies were nominally employed by the teachers. The study revealed that the strategy most frequently employed by the teachers during the problem-solving process was adopting a different point of view, while the strategy of making a drawing was also frequently applied. Moreover, the teachers employed the strategies of intelligent guessing and testing, working backwards, finding a pattern, solving a simpler analogous problem, and considering extreme cases, but with lesser frequency. On the other hand, the strategy of organizing data was not used by any of the teachers.

Keywords

References

  • Abdurrahman, S. M., Abdullah, A. H., Shamsuddin, N. S., Rahman, S. N. S., Ashari, Z. M., Jumaat, N. F., Samah, N. A. & Ali, D. F. (2020). Pupil’s behaviour pattern and non-routine mathematical problem-solving strategy based on multiple intelligences. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(3), 446-485. http://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I3/20201214
  • Achmetli, K., Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2019). Multiple solutions for real-world problems, experience of competence and students’ procedural and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1605-1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9936-5
  • Altun, M., & Arslan, Ç. (2006). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin problem çözme stratejilerini öğrenmeleri üzerine bir çalışma [A study on learning of problem-solving strategies by secondary school students]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1-21.
  • Altun, M., Memnun, D. S., & Yazgan, Y. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının rutin olmayan matematiksel problemleri çözme becerileri ve bu konudaki düşünceleri [Primary school teacher trainees’ skills and opinions on solving non-routine mathematical problems]. İlköğretim Online, 6(1), 127-143.
  • Authors, (2016). [Details removed for peer review]
  • Baki, A. (2015). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi [Mathematics Education from Theory into Practice]. Hece Yayınları.
  • Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers' problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
  • Bruun, F. (2013). Elementary teachers’ perspectives of mathematics problem solving strategies. The Mathematics Educator, 23(1), 45–59.
  • Charles, R., & Lester, F. (1982). Teaching problem solving: What, why and how. Dale Seymour.
  • Csíkos, C., & Szitányi, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching word problem solving strategies. ZDM, 52(1), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01115-y
  • Çepni, S. (2009). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project work]. Celepler.
  • Depaepe, F., Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152-160. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016
  • Follmer, R. (2000). Reading, mathematics and problem solving: the effects of direct instruction in the development of fourth grade students’ strategic reading and problem solving approaches to textbased, nonroutine mathematics problems. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Widener, Chester, PA.
  • Foong, P. Y., & Koay, P. L. (1997). School word problems and stereotyped thinking. Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 73-82.
  • Guven, B., Aydin-Guc, F. & Özmen, Z. M. (2016). Problem types used in math lessons: The relationship between student achievement and teacher preferences. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(6), 863-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1136438
  • Gürbüz, R., & Güder, Y. (2016). Matematik öğretmenlerinin problem çözmede kullandıkları stratejiler [The Strategies Mathematics Teachers Use in Problem Solving]. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(2), 371-386.
  • Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 242-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/749120
  • Ho, F.K., & Hedberg, G., J. (2005). Teachers’ pedagogies and their impact on students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 238-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmathb.2005.09.006
  • Ishida, J. (2002). Students’ evaluation of their strategies when they find several solution methods. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00102-5
  • Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmathb.2011.11.001
  • Ling, Y. S., & Maat, S. M. (2020). Level of use of mathematical problem solving strategies among Kanowit district primary school teachers. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 7(2), 45-57.
  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2017). Matematik öğretmeni özel alan yeterlikleri [Mathematics teacher special field competencies]. Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
  • Ministry of National Education. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar)[Mathematics curriculum: 1-8. Grades]. Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. (1st ed.). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Olkun, S., & Toluk, Z. (2003). Matematik öğretimi [Mathematics teaching]. Anı Publ.
  • Özmen, Z. , Taşkın, D. & Güven, B. (2012). İlköğretim 7. Sınıf matematik öğretmenlerinin kullandıkları problem türlerinin belirlenmesi [Determining the Types of Problems Used by 7th Grade Math Teachers]. Education and Science, (37)165, 246-261.
  • Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (1998). Problem-solving strategies for efficient and elegant solutions. Corwin.
  • Ramnarain, U. (2014). Empowering educationally disadvantaged mathematics students through a strategies-based problem solving approach. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0098-8
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561–574. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.561
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 529–544. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0014224
  • Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014). Do multiple solutions matter? Prompting multiple solutions, interest, competence, and autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 497-533. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0497
  • Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. T. F. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 287-301. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.009
  • Taspinar, Z., & Bulut, M. (2012). Determining of problem solving strategies used by primary 8, grade students’ in mathematics class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3385-3389.
  • Wheatley, G. H. (1984). Problem solving makes math scores soar. Educational Leadership, 41(4), 52-53.
  • Yazgan, Y. & Bintaş, J. (2005). İlköğretim dördüncü ve beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin problem çözme stratejilerini kullanabilme düzeyleri [Fourth and fifth grade students’ levels of using problem solving strategies: a teachıng experiment]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28), 210-218.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Quantitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Yayınevi.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.