Reasons of the problems that academicians experience in management of teaching and learning process
Süleyman Göksoy 1 *
More Detail
1 DuzceUniversity, Faculty of Education
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The present research aims to examine the problems that academicians experience in management of teaching-learning process, to reveal the reasons of the problems and to develop solution suggestions. Case study design of qualitative research methods was used in this research and it includes 41 volunteer academicians. Structured interview form was used in data collection and the data were analyzed with content analysis. It was found that most of the problems academicians experience in management of teaching-learning process were related to students. They also had problems with classroom/course management. In management of teaching-learning processes of the academicians, problems were related to students, physical infrastructure, educational system and society/environment. It can be asserted that most of the problems can be solved if their reasons are determined and handled. Also it is suggested that incoming academicians who are new to academic life need to follow the regulations that includes student discipline regulations and the students need to be informed about the negative behaviors and their consequences at the beginning of the term.

References

  • Acat, B. (2006). Yenilenen ilköğretim programı: Okul yönetimlerini geliştirme programı [Updated elementary curriculum: Curriculum for developing the school management]. Ankara: MoNE.
  • Aydın, M. (1991). Eğitim yönetimi [Educational management]. Ankara: Hatipoğlu.
  • Balcı, A. (2001). Etkili okul ve okul geliştirme [Effective school and school development]. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Başar, H. (1999). Sınıf yönetimi [Classroom management]. Ankara: MoNE.
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış [New structure and behavior in school management]. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Cangelosi, J. S. (2016). Classroom management strategies: Gaining and maintaining students' cooperation (Trans. R. Hoş & M. Toprak). Ankara: Nobel.
  • Celep, C. (2000). Sınıf yönetimi ve disiplin [Classroom management and discipline]. Ankara: Anı.
  • Charles, C. M., Senter, G. W., & Barr, K. B. (1996). Building classroom discipline. New York, USA: Longman Publishers.
  • Demirdağ, S. (2016). Sınıf yönetimine giriş ve temel kavramlar [Introduction to classroom management and basic concepts]. In S. Demirdağ (Ed.), Sınıf yönetimi [Classroom management]. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Erdoğan, İ. (2000). Sınıf yönetimi [Classroom management]. İstanbul: Sistem.
  • Fontana, D. (1985). Classroom control: Understanding and guiding classroom behavior. London: The British Psychological Society.
  • Göksoy, S. (2014). Liderlerin lideri öğretmen [Teacher as the leader of the leaders]. In T. Argon & Ş. S. Nartgün (Eds.), Sınıf yönetimi [Classroom management] (pp.267-284). Ankara: Maya Academy.
  • Göksoy, S. & Arıcan, K. (2014). Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş [Introduction to teaching profession]. In Ed. K. Kıroğlu & C. Elma (Eds.), Eğitim bilimine giriş [Introduction to educational sciences] (pp.259-279). Ankara: Pegem.
  • Hepburn, M. A. & Radz, M. A. (1983). Why we should be concerned: Democratic Education in Schools and Classrooms, (Ed. Mary A. Hepburn). Washington, US: NCSS Bulletin, No.70.
  • Kaya, Z. (2006). Öğreti̇m teknoloji̇leri̇ ve materyal geli̇şti̇rme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2013). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (Trans. G. Arastaman). Ankara: Nobel.
  • Militello, M., Rallis, F., S., & Goldring, B. E. (2013). Leadership through research and action. (Trans. F. Töremen, & A. Ersözlü). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Muller, C., Katz, S., & Dance, L. J. (1999). Investing in teaching and learning: Dynamics of teacher–student relationship from each actor’s perspective. Urban Education, 34, 292–337.
  • Özdemir, S. Yalın, H.İ., & Sezgin, F. (2016). Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş [Introduction to teaching profession]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Özden, Y. (2006). Dönüşüm mimarlığı: Okul yönetimlerini geliştirme programı [Transformational architecture: Curriculum for developing the school management]. Ankara: MoNE.
  • Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York, US: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Schlechty, P. C. (2005). Shaking up the school house (Trans. Y. Özden). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Taşdemir, M. (2000). Eğitimde planlama ve değerlendirme [Educational planning and evaluation]. Ankara Ocak Yayınları.
  • Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 57–67.
  • Yalın, H. İ. (2003). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Desigin and methıds (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.